[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait timeout to 5s

Lofstedt, Marta marta.lofstedt at intel.com
Fri Aug 25 11:54:26 UTC 2017



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:chris at chris-wilson.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 1:47 PM
> To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofstedt at intel.com>; intel-
> gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
> increase FBC wait timeout to 5s
> 
> Quoting Marta Lofstedt (2017-08-25 11:40:29)
> > From: "Lofstedt, Marta" <marta.lofstedt at intel.com>
> >
> > The subtests: igt at kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-*draw*
> > has non-consistent results, pending between fail and pass.
> > The fails are always due to "FBC disabled".
> > With this increase in timeout the flip-flop behavior is no longer
> > reproducible.
> >
> > This is a partial revert of:
> > 64590c7b768dc8d8dd962f812d5ff5a39e7e8b54,
> > where the timeout was decreased from 5s to 2s.
> > After investigating the timeout needed, the conclusion is that the
> > longer timeout is only needed when the test swaps between some
> > specific draw domains, typically blt vs. mmap_cpu.
> > The objective of the FBC part of the tests is not to benchmark draw
> > domain changes, it is to check that FBC was (re-)enabled.
> >
> > V2: Added documentation
> >
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101623
> > Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt at intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > index e03524f1..2538450c 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > @@ -924,7 +924,7 @@ static bool fbc_stride_not_supported(void)
> >
> >  static bool fbc_wait_until_enabled(void)  {
> 
> Try igt_drop_caches_set(device, DROP_RETIRE); instead of relaxing the
> timeout.
> -Chris

OK, I will test that and do a V3 if it works!
/Marta


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list