[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 23/67] drm/i915/gen10: Set value of Indirect Context Offset for gen10

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Tue Jun 6 06:48:03 UTC 2017


On 05/06/2017 18:11, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 10:50 +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> On 06/04/2017 20:15, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>>> From: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
>>>
>>
>> Some commit message needed just to satisfy the form.
> 
> What about:
> 
> Indirect Context Offset Pointer has changed for Cannonlake.
> 
> INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET[15:6] valid value for CNL is 19h per Spec.

Completely fine.

>>
>>> v2: rebased to intel_lr_indirect_ctx_offset
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 5 +++++
>>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>>> index f2d57b4..ac38469 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
>>> @@ -209,6 +209,7 @@
>>>    
>>>    #define GEN8_CTX_RCS_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET_DEFAULT	0x17
>>>    #define GEN9_CTX_RCS_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET_DEFAULT	0x26
>>> +#define GEN10_CTX_RCS_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET_DEFAULT	0x19
>>>    
>>>    /* Typical size of the average request (2 pipecontrols and a MI_BB) */
>>>    #define EXECLISTS_REQUEST_SIZE 64 /* bytes */
>>> @@ -1787,6 +1788,10 @@ static u32 intel_lr_indirect_ctx_offset(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>>>    	default:
>>>    		MISSING_CASE(INTEL_GEN(engine->i915));
>>>    		/* fall through */
>>> +	case 10:
>>> +		indirect_ctx_offset =
>>> +			GEN10_CTX_RCS_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET_DEFAULT;
>>> +		break;
>>>    	case 9:
>>>    		indirect_ctx_offset =
>>>    			GEN9_CTX_RCS_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET_DEFAULT;
>>>
>>
>> After some documentation and commit log traversing to find the relevant
>> page, and with a short sentence in the commit message:
> 
> is the above enough?
> 
> Bspec index/11740
> or CNL:BUG:1929753

If we have decided to start putting in those that's fine by me.

Regards,

Tvrtko

> 
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tvrtko
> 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list