[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] #1: test capitalizing PATCH
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Wed Mar 1 09:57:43 UTC 2017
On Wed, 01 Mar 2017, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28-02-17 17:31, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>
>> Cc: Hans, this probably applies to you as well.
>
> I'm already always using git-send-email, so whatever the
> reason why the CI system is not picking up my patches, this
> aint it.
It doesn't look like your patches match [1], though. Do you have the
sendemail.xmailer config option set to false?
BR,
Jani.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>>
>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com> wrote:
>>> The new version patchwork is filtering out my patches for some reason.
>>> Test if it's because it now insists on a capital [PATCH] in the subject.
>>>
>>> Patchwork should be more version control agnostic than that.
>>
>> The patchwork flavor at freedesktop.org expects patches are sent using
>> git send-email [1]. I hear otherwise there were too many false
>> positives.
>>
>> Please either use git send-email, or add
>>
>> X-Mailer: git-send-email haha only kidding
>>
>> header into your patch mails.
>>
>> I'm sorry for the inconvenience and lack of transparency on
>> this. Apparently git send-email is so ubiquitous nowadays that this
>> hasn't been much of a problem.
>>
>>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>>
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/dlespiau/patchwork/blob/master/patchwork/bin/parsemail.py#L323
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list