[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] #1: test capitalizing PATCH

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 01-03-17 10:57, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Mar 2017, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 28-02-17 17:31, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>
>>> Cc: Hans, this probably applies to you as well.
>>
>> I'm already always using git-send-email, so whatever the
>> reason why the CI system is not picking up my patches, this
>> aint it.
>
> It doesn't look like your patches match [1], though. Do you have the
> sendemail.xmailer config option set to false?

Nope, just send myself a test patch:

Date: Wed,  1 Mar 2017 11:05:32 +0100
Message-Id: <20170301100532.26692-1-hdegoede at redhat.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.3

Result: 250


But indeed the header is gone when it hits my own Inbox,
seems this gets stripped by the Red Hat smtp server somehow ?

I will file a ticket with our it department for this.

Regards,

Hans


>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2017, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> The new version patchwork is filtering out my patches for some reason.
>>>> Test if it's because it now insists on a capital [PATCH] in the subject.
>>>>
>>>> Patchwork should be more version control agnostic than that.
>>>
>>> The patchwork flavor at freedesktop.org expects patches are sent using
>>> git send-email [1]. I hear otherwise there were too many false
>>> positives.
>>>
>>> Please either use git send-email, or add
>>>
>>> X-Mailer: git-send-email haha only kidding
>>>
>>> header into your patch mails.
>>>
>>> I'm sorry for the inconvenience and lack of transparency on
>>> this. Apparently git send-email is so ubiquitous nowadays that this
>>> hasn't been much of a problem.
>>>
>>>
>>> BR,
>>> Jani.
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/dlespiau/patchwork/blob/master/patchwork/bin/parsemail.py#L323
>>>
>