[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/3] drm/i915/guc: Make scratch register base and count flexible

[Joonas Lahtinen]

On ke, 2017-05-10 at 13:32 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 May 2017, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On ti, 2017-05-09 at 14:08 +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> > > 
> > > We are using some scratch registers in MMIO based send function.
> > > Make their base and count flexible in preparation of upcoming
> > > GuC firmware/hardware changes. While around, change cmd len
> > > parameter verification from WARN_ON to GEM_BUG_ON as we don't
> > > need this all the time.
> > > 
> > > v2: call out WARN/GEM_BUG change in the commit msg (Daniele)
> > > v3: don't overqualify the ints (Chris)
> > > v4: rebase and use proper enum
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> > > Suggested-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
> > 
> > I suppose this could've had "# v2" at the end, unless Daniele acked all
> > the remaining changes.
> > 
> > Anyway, looks good to me with the changes.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Could use an A-b from Jani for disagree and commit stamp as he
> > initially objected the way of implementing this. 
> 
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>

Michal, could you apply the tags and re-send the series so CI picks it
up.

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation