[Intel-gfx] New "RPM wakelock ref not held during HW access" in 4.12-rc1 ?
Hans de Goede
hdegoede at redhat.com
Fri May 26 08:37:37 UTC 2017
Hi,
On 18-05-17 15:59, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16-05-17 12:34, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 May 2017, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> mn Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:47:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 15 May 2017, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm seeing this on suspend/resume on a GPD-win,
>>>>> cherrytrail z8700 device:
<snip>
>>> ebf5f921478b ("drm/i915: Stop pretending to mask/unmask LPE audio
>>> interrupts") is a more likely candidate.
>
> I can confirm that that patch does fix this.
>
>> Is that applicable to v4.12-rc1?
>
> I added it to my 4.12-rc1 based tree with a simple git cherry-pick
> without any conflicts, so from a does it apply pov yes it is
> applicable. If it is a good idea to merge it into 4.12-rc#, I don't
> know.
I've been running with commit ebf5f921478b cherry picked into my
kernel for a while now on multiple Bay and Cherry Trail devices,
and it fixes the below oops on suspend resume.
Can we get this commit cherry-picked into fixes please ?
Note this is masking the other oops I reported since we only report
one of these per suspend/resume, which is likely why no-one else is
reporting the other oops.
Regards,
Hans
>>>>> [ 75.514651] RPM wakelock ref not held during HW access
>>>>> [ 75.514827] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>>> [ 75.515025] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1832 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h:1780 fwtable_write32+0x1d3/0x240 [i915]
>>>>> ...
>>>>> [ 75.515704] RIP: 0010:fwtable_write32+0x1d3/0x240 [i915]
>>>>> ...
>>>>> [ 75.515767] Call Trace:
>>>>> [ 75.515952] lpe_audio_irq_unmask+0x6a/0xc0 [i915]
>>>>> [ 75.515972] irq_enable+0x3a/0x50
>>>>> [ 75.515984] __enable_irq+0x34/0x60
>>>>> [ 75.515996] resume_irqs+0x8f/0xd0
>>>>> [ 75.516007] resume_device_irqs+0x10/0x20
>>>>> [ 75.516021] dpm_resume_noirq+0x23e/0x310
>>>>> [ 75.516041] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x2f3/0x7f0
>>>>> [ 75.516055] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
>>>>> [ 75.516067] pm_suspend+0x335/0x3a0
>>>>> [ 75.516078] state_store+0x85/0xf0
>>>>> [ 75.516095] kobj_attr_store+0xf/0x20
>>>>> [ 75.516108] sysfs_kf_write+0x37/0x40
>>>>> [ 75.516117] kernfs_fop_write+0x11c/0x1a0
>>>>> [ 75.516132] __vfs_write+0x37/0x160
>>>>> [ 75.516145] ? selinux_file_permission+0xfb/0x120
>>>>> [ 75.516158] ? security_file_permission+0x3b/0xc0
>>>>> [ 75.516169] vfs_write+0xb1/0x1a0
>>>>> [ 75.516180] SyS_write+0x55/0xc0
>>>>> [ 75.516197] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xa5
>>>>> ...
>>>>> [ 76.584235] PM: early resume of devices complete after 1067.477 msecs
>>>>>
>>>>> If someone has a fix for this they want me to try, let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Hans
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>>>>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list