[Intel-gfx] New "RPM wakelock ref not held during HW access" in 4.12-rc1 ?

[Jani Nikula]

On Fri, 26 May 2017, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 18-05-17 15:59, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On 16-05-17 12:34, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> On Tue, 16 May 2017, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>> mn Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:47:48AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 15 May 2017, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm seeing this on suspend/resume on a GPD-win,
>>>>>> cherrytrail z8700 device:
>
> <snip>
>
>>>> ebf5f921478b ("drm/i915: Stop pretending to mask/unmask LPE audio
>>>> interrupts") is a more likely candidate.
>> 
>> I can confirm that that patch does fix this.
>> 
>>> Is that applicable to v4.12-rc1?
>> 
>> I added it to my 4.12-rc1 based tree with a simple git cherry-pick
>> without any conflicts, so from a does it apply pov yes it is
>> applicable. If it is a good idea to merge it into 4.12-rc#, I don't
>> know.
>
> I've been running with commit ebf5f921478b cherry picked into my
> kernel for a while now on multiple Bay and Cherry Trail devices,
> and it fixes the below oops on suspend resume.
>
> Can we get this commit cherry-picked into fixes please ?

Done, with your Tested-by. I expect it to hit -rc4.

> Note this is masking the other oops I reported since we only report
> one of these per suspend/resume, which is likely why no-one else is
> reporting the other oops.

I fail, what's the other oops?


Thanks,
Jani.

>


>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
>>>>>> [   75.514651] RPM wakelock ref not held during HW access
>>>>>> [   75.514827] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>>>>> [   75.515025] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1832 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h:1780 fwtable_write32+0x1d3/0x240 [i915]
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> [   75.515704] RIP: 0010:fwtable_write32+0x1d3/0x240 [i915]
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> [   75.515767] Call Trace:
>>>>>> [   75.515952]  lpe_audio_irq_unmask+0x6a/0xc0 [i915]
>>>>>> [   75.515972]  irq_enable+0x3a/0x50
>>>>>> [   75.515984]  __enable_irq+0x34/0x60
>>>>>> [   75.515996]  resume_irqs+0x8f/0xd0
>>>>>> [   75.516007]  resume_device_irqs+0x10/0x20
>>>>>> [   75.516021]  dpm_resume_noirq+0x23e/0x310
>>>>>> [   75.516041]  suspend_devices_and_enter+0x2f3/0x7f0
>>>>>> [   75.516055]  ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
>>>>>> [   75.516067]  pm_suspend+0x335/0x3a0
>>>>>> [   75.516078]  state_store+0x85/0xf0
>>>>>> [   75.516095]  kobj_attr_store+0xf/0x20
>>>>>> [   75.516108]  sysfs_kf_write+0x37/0x40
>>>>>> [   75.516117]  kernfs_fop_write+0x11c/0x1a0
>>>>>> [   75.516132]  __vfs_write+0x37/0x160
>>>>>> [   75.516145]  ? selinux_file_permission+0xfb/0x120
>>>>>> [   75.516158]  ? security_file_permission+0x3b/0xc0
>>>>>> [   75.516169]  vfs_write+0xb1/0x1a0
>>>>>> [   75.516180]  SyS_write+0x55/0xc0
>>>>>> [   75.516197]  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1a/0xa5
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> [   76.584235] PM: early resume of devices complete after 1067.477 msecs
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If someone has a fix for this they want me to try, let me know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hans
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>>>>>> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
>>>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center