[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v8 4/5] drm/i915: Do not allocate unused PPAT entries

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Zhi Wang (2017-09-08 10:05:52)
> Only PPAT entries 0/2/3/4 are using. Remove extra PPAT entry allocation
> during initialization.
> 
> v8:
> 
> - Move ppat_index() into i915_gem_gtt.c. (Chris)
> - Change the name of ppat_bits_to_index to ppat_index.
> 
> Cc: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky at intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Suggested-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index d8d2b4a..82cb97b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -2979,6 +2979,13 @@ static unsigned int chv_private_pat_match(u8 src, u8 dst)
>                 INTEL_PPAT_PERFECT_MATCH : 0;
>  }
>  
> +/* PPAT index = 4 * PAT + 2 * PCD + PWT */
> +static inline unsigned int ppat_index(unsigned int bits)
> +{
> +       return (4 * !!(bits & _PAGE_PAT) + 2 * !!(bits & _PAGE_PCD)
> +               + !!(bits & _PAGE_PWT));

I'm feeling very dumb, having quickly grepped the bspec for why those
bits map to a particular PAT entry. Clue for enlightenment?
-Chris