[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915: Wrap access to module params into macro
Michal Wajdeczko
michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Thu Sep 14 14:03:00 UTC 2017
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:10:22 +0200, Jani Nikula
<jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com> wrote:
>> @@ -1031,9 +1031,9 @@ static void i915_driver_cleanup_mmio(struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>
>> static void intel_sanitize_options(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> {
>> - i915.enable_execlists =
>> + i915_param(enable_execlists) =
>
> I disapprove using a function-like macro expansion as an lvalue. If you
> want to use a getter macro, also provide a setter, and use them
> separately.
>
What about this set of macros:
#define i915_param(n) ({ i915_params.n; })
#define i915_param_set(n,e) ({ i915_params.n = e; })
#define i915_param_inc(n) ({ i915_params.n++; })
#define i915_param_dec(n) ({ i915_params.n--; })
#define i915_param_ptr(n) ({ &i915_params.n; })
then corresponding code update can be done with:
@@
identifier n;
expression e;
@@
(
- i915_param(n) = e;
+ i915_param_set(n, e);
|
- i915_param(n)++;
+ i915_param_inc(n);
|
- i915_param(n)--;
+ i915_param_dec(n);
)
Michal
> BR,
> Jani.
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list