[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v4] drm/i915: Enable edp psr error interrupts on hsw (rev3)
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Fri Apr 20 21:33:42 UTC 2018
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:29:09AM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 10:59 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:49:25AM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > > == Series Details ==
> > >
> > > Series: series starting with [v4] drm/i915: Enable edp psr error interrupts on hsw (rev3)
> > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/41095/
> > > State : warning
> > >
> > > == Summary ==
> > >
> > > $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
> > > 0a22dbbae8f8 drm/i915: Enable edp psr error interrupts on hsw
> > > -:111: CHECK:SPACING: spaces preferred around that '<<' (ctx:VxV)
> > > #111: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:4032:
> > > +#define EDP_PSR_ERROR (1<<2)
> > > ^
> > >
> > > -:112: CHECK:SPACING: spaces preferred around that '<<' (ctx:VxV)
> > > #112: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:4033:
> > > +#define EDP_PSR_POST_EXIT (1<<1)
> > > ^
> > >
> > > -:113: CHECK:SPACING: spaces preferred around that '<<' (ctx:VxV)
> > > #113: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:4034:
> > > +#define EDP_PSR_PRE_ENTRY (1<<0)
> > > ^
> > >
> > > -:122: CHECK:SPACING: spaces preferred around that '<<' (ctx:VxV)
> > > #122: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:6847:
> > > +#define DE_EDP_PSR_INT_HSW (1<<19)
> > > ^
> > >
> > > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 4 checks, 78 lines checked
> > > 7fdf2eed9ed4 drm/i915: Enable edp psr error interrupts on bdw+
> > > -:159: ERROR:COMPLEX_MACRO: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
> > > #159: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h:221:
> > > +#define for_each_cpu_transcoder_masked(__dev_priv, __t, __mask) \
> > > + for ((__t) = 0; (__t) < I915_MAX_TRANSCODERS; (__t)++) \
> > > + for_each_if ((__mask) & (1 << (__t)))
> >
> > This showed up on red on dim when I was going to push here...
> >
> > DK, could you please address this one here before we can push?
> >
>
> The macros look correct to me, that is how other macros are written too.
> check_patch is confused?
Well, you are right. New macro is just like the other for_each_*
If we need a clean we can do that later, or silent dim on that...
Anyways, pushed this patches to dinq.
Thanks for patches, reviews, patience and extra checks ;)
>
> > Thanks,
> > Rodrigo.
> >
> > >
> > > -:159: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse '__t' - possible side-effects?
> > > #159: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h:221:
> > > +#define for_each_cpu_transcoder_masked(__dev_priv, __t, __mask) \
> > > + for ((__t) = 0; (__t) < I915_MAX_TRANSCODERS; (__t)++) \
> > > + for_each_if ((__mask) & (1 << (__t)))
> > >
> > > -:160: CHECK:SPACING: No space is necessary after a cast
> > > #160: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h:222:
> > > + for ((__t) = 0; (__t) < I915_MAX_TRANSCODERS; (__t)++) \
> > >
> > > -:161: WARNING:SPACING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
> > > #161: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h:223:
> > > + for_each_if ((__mask) & (1 << (__t)))
> > >
> > > total: 1 errors, 1 warnings, 2 checks, 123 lines checked
> > > 003ec0005027 drm/i915/psr: Control PSR interrupts via debugfs
> > > d8186b823b62 drm/i915/psr: Timestamps for PSR entry and exit interrupts.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list