[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [v4] drm/i915: Enable edp psr error interrupts on hsw (rev3)

[Dhinakaran Pandiyan]

On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 10:59 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:49:25AM -0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: series starting with [v4] drm/i915: Enable edp psr error interrupts on hsw (rev3)
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/41095/
> > State : warning
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > $ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
> > 0a22dbbae8f8 drm/i915: Enable edp psr error interrupts on hsw
> > -:111: CHECK:SPACING: spaces preferred around that '<<' (ctx:VxV)
> > #111: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:4032:
> > +#define   EDP_PSR_ERROR				(1<<2)
> >                         				  ^
> > 
> > -:112: CHECK:SPACING: spaces preferred around that '<<' (ctx:VxV)
> > #112: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:4033:
> > +#define   EDP_PSR_POST_EXIT			(1<<1)
> >                             			  ^
> > 
> > -:113: CHECK:SPACING: spaces preferred around that '<<' (ctx:VxV)
> > #113: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:4034:
> > +#define   EDP_PSR_PRE_ENTRY			(1<<0)
> >                             			  ^
> > 
> > -:122: CHECK:SPACING: spaces preferred around that '<<' (ctx:VxV)
> > #122: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h:6847:
> > +#define DE_EDP_PSR_INT_HSW		(1<<19)
> >                            		  ^
> > 
> > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 4 checks, 78 lines checked
> > 7fdf2eed9ed4 drm/i915: Enable edp psr error interrupts on bdw+
> > -:159: ERROR:COMPLEX_MACRO: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
> > #159: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h:221:
> > +#define for_each_cpu_transcoder_masked(__dev_priv, __t, __mask) \
> > +	for ((__t) = 0; (__t) < I915_MAX_TRANSCODERS; (__t)++)	\
> > +		for_each_if ((__mask) & (1 << (__t)))
> 
> This showed up on red on dim when I was going to push here...
> 
> DK, could you please address this one here before we can push?
> 

The macros look correct to me, that is how other macros are written too.
check_patch is confused?

> Thanks,
> Rodrigo.
> 
> > 
> > -:159: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse '__t' - possible side-effects?
> > #159: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h:221:
> > +#define for_each_cpu_transcoder_masked(__dev_priv, __t, __mask) \
> > +	for ((__t) = 0; (__t) < I915_MAX_TRANSCODERS; (__t)++)	\
> > +		for_each_if ((__mask) & (1 << (__t)))
> > 
> > -:160: CHECK:SPACING: No space is necessary after a cast
> > #160: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h:222:
> > +	for ((__t) = 0; (__t) < I915_MAX_TRANSCODERS; (__t)++)	\
> > 
> > -:161: WARNING:SPACING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
> > #161: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.h:223:
> > +		for_each_if ((__mask) & (1 << (__t)))
> > 
> > total: 1 errors, 1 warnings, 2 checks, 123 lines checked
> > 003ec0005027 drm/i915/psr: Control PSR interrupts via debugfs
> > d8186b823b62 drm/i915/psr: Timestamps for PSR entry and exit interrupts.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx