[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: More debug info for fb leaks in mode_config_cleanup

[Thomas Hellstrom]

Hi!

On 12/07/2017 03:49 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> We're spotting this very rarely in CI, but have no idea. Let's add
> more debug info about what's going on here.
>
> References:https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102707
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter<daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c
> index cc78b3d9e5e4..6ffe952142e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c
> @@ -469,6 +469,9 @@ void drm_mode_config_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev)
>   	 */
>   	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dev->mode_config.fb_list));
>   	list_for_each_entry_safe(fb, fbt, &dev->mode_config.fb_list, head) {
> +		struct drm_printer p = drm_debug_printer("[leaked fb]");
> +		drm_printf(&p, "framebuffer[%u]:\n", fb->base.id);
> +		drm_framebuffer_print_info(&p, 1, fb);
>   		drm_framebuffer_free(&fb->base.refcount);
>   	}
>   

Did we ever get to the bottom of what's causing this? We've seen 
occasional framebuffer leaks when transitioning from one to two screens 
and back again with vmwgfx on older drms, but I can't seem to reproduce 
that with the latest upstream code?

Thanks,

Thomas