[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/11] drm/i915: Improve PSR2 CTL macros

[Dhinakaran Pandiyan]

On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 18:25 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> - Reusing the EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU_SHIFT in
> EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU
> - Removing unused EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU_MASK
> - Adding EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU_MAX
> - Adding EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAME()
> - Adding EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAME_MAX
> 
> In the next patch the new macros will be used.
> 
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index d3ef97915455..9e46da5032c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -4216,10 +4216,11 @@ enum {
>  #define   EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_50us	(3 << 8)
>  #define   EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_MASK	(3 << 8)
>  #define   EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU_SHIFT 4
> -#define   EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU_MASK	(0xf << 4)
_MASKs are useful when we want to read back the register for debugging.
So, I'm not fully convinced this is an improvement.

Rodrigo, your thoughts on this?


> -#define   EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU(a)	((a) << 4)
> -#define   EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAME_MASK	0xf
> +#define   EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU_MAX	0xf
> +#define   EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU(a)	((a) <<
> EDP_PSR2_FRAME_BEFORE_SU_SHIFT)
>  #define   EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT	0
> +#define   EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAME_MAX	0xf
Not sure if this is better than re-using _MASK here. I'm sure there are
places in the driver where we already do that.

> +#define   EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAME(a)	((a) <<
> EDP_PSR2_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT)
>  
>  #define _PSR_EVENT_TRANS_A			0x60848
>  #define _PSR_EVENT_TRANS_B			0x61848