[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 9/9] drm/i915/psr: Check if source supports sink specific SU granularity
José Roberto de Souza
jose.souza at intel.com
Tue Dec 4 00:34:03 UTC 2018
According to eDP spec, sink can required specific selective update
granularity that source must comply.
Here caching the value if required and checking if source supports
it.
v3:
- Returning the default granularity in case DPCD read fails(Dhinakaran)
- Changed DPCD error message level(Dhinakaran)
v4:
- Setting granularity to defaul when granularity read is equal to
0(Dhinakaran)
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 12b8476b09a2..81618af7a5d7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -508,6 +508,7 @@ struct i915_psr {
ktime_t last_exit;
bool sink_not_reliable;
bool irq_aux_error;
+ u16 su_x_granularity;
};
enum intel_pch {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index 298c3145212d..cb04d806f456 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -261,6 +261,32 @@ static u8 intel_dp_get_sink_sync_latency(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
return val;
}
+static u16 intel_dp_get_su_x_granulartiy(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
+{
+ u16 val;
+ ssize_t r;
+
+ /*
+ * Returning the default X granularity if granularity not required or
+ * if DPCD read fails
+ */
+ if (!(intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1] & DP_PSR2_SU_GRANULARITY_REQUIRED))
+ return 4;
+
+ r = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY, &val, 2);
+ if (r != 2)
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unable to read DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY\n");
+
+ /*
+ * Spec says that if the value read is 0 the default granularity should
+ * be used instead.
+ */
+ if (r != 2 || val == 0)
+ val = 4;
+
+ return val;
+}
+
void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
@@ -315,6 +341,8 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
if (dev_priv->psr.sink_psr2_support) {
dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support =
intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status(intel_dp);
+ dev_priv->psr.su_x_granularity =
+ intel_dp_get_su_x_granulartiy(intel_dp);
}
}
}
@@ -541,9 +569,9 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
* X coordinate and Y granularity requirements will always be met. We
* only need to validate the SU block width is a multiple of 4.
*/
- if (crtc_hdisplay % 4) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, hdisplay(%d) not multiple of 4\n",
- crtc_hdisplay);
+ if (crtc_hdisplay % dev_priv->psr.su_x_granularity) {
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, hdisplay(%d) not multiple of %d\n",
+ crtc_hdisplay, dev_priv->psr.su_x_granularity);
return false;
}
--
2.19.2
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list