[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH igt v3] igt/perf_pmu: Use a self-correcting busy pwm
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Wed Feb 21 13:00:33 UTC 2018
On 21/02/2018 12:10, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Convert the busy pwm from using a single calibration pass with a fixed
> target into a self-correcting pwm that tries to adjust how long to sleep
> on each pwm in order to converge at the target busy %%.
>
> Being self-correcting, it should fare better against the more variable
> systems CI presents.
>
> v2: Be fair and equally strict for low/high busy %%
> v3: target_idle_us and calculate expected from timing of each individual pass
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105157
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/perf_pmu.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> index 7fab73e2..98d8dbff 100644
> --- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
> +++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
> @@ -1422,9 +1422,10 @@ accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
> busy_us / 100) / target_busy_pct;
> unsigned long pwm_calibration_us;
> unsigned long test_us;
> - double busy_r;
> + double busy_r, expected;
> uint64_t val[2];
> uint64_t ts[2];
> + int link[2];
> int fd;
>
> /* Sampling platforms cannot reach the high accuracy criteria. */
> @@ -1450,14 +1451,16 @@ accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
> assert_within_epsilon((double)busy_us / (busy_us + idle_us),
> (double)target_busy_pct / 100.0, tolerance);
>
> + igt_assert(pipe(link) == 0);
> +
> /* Emit PWM pattern on the engine from a child. */
> igt_fork(child, 1) {
> struct sched_param rt = { .sched_priority = 99 };
> - const unsigned long timeout[] = { pwm_calibration_us * 1000,
> - test_us * 2 * 1000 };
> - unsigned long sleep_busy = busy_us;
> - unsigned long sleep_idle = idle_us;
> + const unsigned long timeout[] = {
> + pwm_calibration_us * 1000, test_us * 2 * 1000
> + };
> struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj = {};
> + uint64_t total_busy_ns = 0, total_idle_ns = 0;
> igt_spin_t *spin;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -1478,76 +1481,67 @@ accuracy(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
>
> /* 1st pass is calibration, second pass is the test. */
> for (int pass = 0; pass < ARRAY_SIZE(timeout); pass++) {
> - unsigned long busy_ns = 0, idle_ns = 0;
> + uint64_t busy_ns = -total_busy_ns;
> + uint64_t idle_ns = -total_idle_ns;
> struct timespec test_start = { };
> - unsigned long loops = 0;
> - double err_busy, err_idle;
>
> igt_nsec_elapsed(&test_start);
> do {
> struct timespec t_busy = { };
> + unsigned int target_idle_us;
>
> igt_nsec_elapsed(&t_busy);
>
> /* Restart the spinbatch. */
> __rearm_spin_batch(spin);
> __submit_spin_batch(gem_fd, &obj, e);
> - measured_usleep(sleep_busy);
> + measured_usleep(busy_us);
> igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
> gem_sync(gem_fd, obj.handle);
>
> - busy_ns += igt_nsec_elapsed(&t_busy);
> + total_busy_ns += igt_nsec_elapsed(&t_busy);
>
> - idle_ns += measured_usleep(sleep_idle);
> -
> - loops++;
> + target_idle_us =
> + (100 * total_busy_ns / target_busy_pct - (total_busy_ns + total_idle_ns)) / 1000;
> + total_idle_ns += measured_usleep(target_idle_us);
> } while (igt_nsec_elapsed(&test_start) < timeout[pass]);
>
> - busy_ns = div_round_up(busy_ns, loops);
> - idle_ns = div_round_up(idle_ns, loops);
> -
> - err_busy = __error(busy_ns / 1000, busy_us);
> - err_idle = __error(idle_ns / 1000, idle_us);
> -
> - igt_info("%u: busy %lu/%lu %.2f%%, idle %lu/%lu %.2f%%\n",
> - pass,
> - busy_ns / 1000, busy_us, err_busy,
> - idle_ns / 1000, idle_us, err_idle);
> -
> - if (pass == 0) {
> - sleep_busy = (double)busy_us -
> - (double)busy_us * err_busy / 100.0;
> - sleep_idle = (double)idle_us -
> - (double)idle_us * err_idle / 100.0;
> - igt_info("calibrated sleeps ratio %.2f%% (%lu/%lu)\n",
> - (double)sleep_busy /
> - (sleep_busy + sleep_idle) * 100.0,
> - sleep_busy, sleep_idle);
> - }
> + busy_ns += total_busy_ns;
> + idle_ns += total_idle_ns;
> +
> + expected = (double)busy_ns / (busy_ns + idle_ns);
> + igt_info("%u: busy %luus, idle %luus: %.2f%% (target: %lu%%)\n",
> + pass, busy_ns / 1000, idle_ns / 1000,
> + 100 * expected, target_busy_pct);
> + write(link[1], &expected, sizeof(expected));
> }
>
> igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
> }
>
> /* Let the child run. */
> - usleep(pwm_calibration_us * 2);
> + read(link[0], &expected, sizeof(expected));
> + assert_within_epsilon(expected, target_busy_pct/100., 0.05);
>
> /* Collect engine busyness for an interesting part of child runtime. */
> fd = open_pmu(I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(e->class, e->instance));
> val[0] = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[0]);
> - usleep(test_us / 2);
> + read(link[0], &expected, sizeof(expected));
> val[1] = __pmu_read_single(fd, &ts[1]);
> close(fd);
>
> + close(link[1]);
> + close(link[0]);
> +
> igt_waitchildren();
>
> busy_r = (double)(val[1] - val[0]) / (ts[1] - ts[0]);
>
> - igt_info("error=%.2f%% (%.2f%% vs %lu%%)\n",
> - __error(busy_r, target_busy_pct / 100.0),
> - busy_r * 100.0, target_busy_pct);
> + igt_info("error=%.2f%% (%.2f%% vs %.2f%%)\n",
> + __error(busy_r, expected), 100 * busy_r, 100 * expected);
>
> - assert_within_epsilon(busy_r, (double)target_busy_pct / 100.0, 0.15);
> + assert_within_epsilon(busy_r, expected, 0.15);
> + assert_within_epsilon(1 - busy_r, 1 - expected, 0.15);
> }
>
> igt_main
>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list