[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt 2/2] igt/gem_spin_batch: Avoid waiting when running concurrently
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Feb 21 14:45:22 UTC 2018
If we do a global wait while trying to execute spinners in parallel,
it ends badly with a GPU hang.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104352
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
tests/gem_spin_batch.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/gem_spin_batch.c b/tests/gem_spin_batch.c
index 026f9830..cffeb6d7 100644
--- a/tests/gem_spin_batch.c
+++ b/tests/gem_spin_batch.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static void spin(int fd, unsigned int engine, unsigned int timeout_sec)
struct timespec itv = { };
uint64_t elapsed;
- spin = igt_spin_batch_new(fd, 0, engine, 0);
+ spin = __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, 0, engine, 0);
while ((elapsed = igt_nsec_elapsed(&tv)) >> 30 < timeout_sec) {
igt_spin_t *next = __igt_spin_batch_new(fd, 0, engine, 0);
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ static void spin(int fd, unsigned int engine, unsigned int timeout_sec)
loops, (long long)elapsed, (long)(elapsed / timeout_100ms));
assert_within_epsilon(timeout_100ms * loops, elapsed, MAX_ERROR);
- igt_assert_eq(intel_detect_and_clear_missed_interrupts(fd), 0);
}
static void spin_exit_handler(int sig)
@@ -101,15 +100,18 @@ igt_main
}
for (e = intel_execution_engines; e->name; e++) {
- if (e->exec_id == 0)
- continue;
-
- igt_subtest_f("basic-%s", e->name)
+ igt_subtest_f("basic-%s", e->name) {
+ intel_detect_and_clear_missed_interrupts(fd);
spin(fd, e->exec_id, 3);
+ igt_assert_eq(intel_detect_and_clear_missed_interrupts(fd), 0);
+ }
}
- igt_subtest("spin-each")
+ igt_subtest("spin-each") {
+ intel_detect_and_clear_missed_interrupts(fd);
spin_on_all_engines(fd, 3);
+ igt_assert_eq(intel_detect_and_clear_missed_interrupts(fd), 0);
+ }
igt_fixture {
igt_stop_hang_detector();
--
2.16.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list