[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/6] drm/i915: Clean up fbc vs. plane checks
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Thu Feb 22 14:07:53 UTC 2018
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:59:27PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Ville Syrjala (2018-02-21 17:31:01)
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Let's record the information whether a plane can do fbc or not under
> > struct inte_plane.
> >
> > v2: Rebase due to i9xx_plane_id
> > Handle BDW/HSW correctly
> > v3: Move inte_fbc_init() back since we depend on it happening
> > even with i915.disable_display, and populate
> > fbc->possible_framebuffer_bits directly from the
> > plane init code instead
> >
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c | 26 ++---------------------
> > 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index d2a66704e6f5..c60d2215b377 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -13238,6 +13238,32 @@ static const struct drm_plane_funcs intel_cursor_plane_funcs = {
> > .format_mod_supported = intel_cursor_plane_format_mod_supported,
> > };
> >
> > +static bool i9xx_plane_has_fbc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > + enum i9xx_plane_id i9xx_plane)
> > +{
> > + if (!HAS_FBC(dev_priv))
> > + return false;
>
> > -static inline bool fbc_on_pipe_a_only(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > -{
> > - return IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline bool fbc_on_plane_a_only(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > -{
> > - return INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 4;
> > -}
>
> > +
> > + if (IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv) || IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
> > + return i9xx_plane == PLANE_A;
>
> Where PLANE_A is tied to PIPE_A by construction. Is that worth a quick
> comment?
Wouldn't hurt to spell it out I suppose.
>
> > + else if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev_priv))
> > + return i9xx_plane == PLANE_A || i9xx_plane == PLANE_B ||
> > + i9xx_plane == PLANE_C;
> > + else if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 4)
> > + return i9xx_plane == PLANE_A || i9xx_plane == PLANE_B;
> > + else
> > + return i9xx_plane == PLANE_A;
>
> Ok, looks a bit more complete than before.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool skl_plane_has_fbc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > + enum pipe pipe, enum plane_id plane_id)
> > +{
> > + if (!HAS_FBC(dev_priv))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + return pipe == PIPE_A && plane_id == PLANE_PRIMARY;
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct intel_plane *
> > intel_primary_plane_create(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
> > {
> > @@ -13280,6 +13306,21 @@ intel_primary_plane_create(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
> > primary->i9xx_plane = (enum i9xx_plane_id) pipe;
> > primary->id = PLANE_PRIMARY;
> > primary->frontbuffer_bit = INTEL_FRONTBUFFER(pipe, primary->id);
> > +
> > + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
> > + primary->has_fbc = skl_plane_has_fbc(dev_priv,
> > + primary->pipe,
> > + primary->id);
> > + else
> > + primary->has_fbc = i9xx_plane_has_fbc(dev_priv,
> > + primary->i9xx_plane);
> > +
> > + if (primary->has_fbc) {
> > + struct intel_fbc *fbc = &dev_priv->fbc;
> > +
> > + fbc->possible_framebuffer_bits |= primary->frontbuffer_bit;
> > + }
>
> So an equivalent init loop to
>
> > - for_each_pipe(dev_priv, pipe) {
> > - fbc->possible_framebuffer_bits |=
> > - INTEL_FRONTBUFFER(pipe, PLANE_PRIMARY);
> > -
> > - if (fbc_on_pipe_a_only(dev_priv))
> > - break;
> > - }
>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> -Chris
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list