[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/uc: Introduce intel_uc_suspend|resume
Michal Wajdeczko
michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Mon Feb 26 12:33:46 UTC 2018
On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 07:58:49 +0100, Sagar Arun Kamble
<sagar.a.kamble at intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 2/23/2018 7:40 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>> We want to use higher level 'uc' functions as the main entry points to
>> the GuC/HuC code to hide some details and keep code layered.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
>
> Couple of queries:
> Need to add to commit message that ordering of disable_guc_interrupts
> and suspend is now changed as needed
> for CTB. right?
Correct, I'll send v2 with updated commit message
> Please find below another query.
>> ---
> <snip>
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
>> @@ -445,3 +445,48 @@ void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private
>> *dev_priv)
>> if (USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv))
>> gen9_disable_guc_interrupts(dev_priv);
>> }
>> +
>> +int intel_uc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> +{
>> + struct intel_guc *guc = &i915->guc;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + if (!USES_GUC(i915))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (guc->fw.load_status != INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS)
> Assume this will get replaced by intel_uc_fw_is_loaded from other patch
> under review?
That's correct too.
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + err = intel_guc_suspend(guc);
>> + if (err) {
>> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Failed to suspend GuC, err=%d", err);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + gen9_disable_guc_interrupts(i915);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int intel_uc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> +{
>> + struct intel_guc *guc = &i915->guc;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + if (!USES_GUC(i915))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (guc->fw.load_status != INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SUCCESS)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (i915_modparams.guc_log_level)
>> + gen9_enable_guc_interrupts(i915);
>> +
>> + err = intel_guc_resume(guc);
>> + if (err) {
>> + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Failed to resume GuC, err=%d", err);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
>> index f2984e0..f76d51d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
>> @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
>> void intel_uc_fini_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> int intel_uc_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> void intel_uc_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> +int intel_uc_suspend(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> +int intel_uc_resume(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> static inline bool intel_uc_is_using_guc(void)
>> {
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list