[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/psr: Don't avoid PSR when PSR2 conditions are not met.
Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com
Tue Feb 27 22:47:26 UTC 2018
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 13:29 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> We can still use PSR1 when PSR2 conditions are not met.
>
> So, let's split the check in a way that we make sure has_psr
> gets set independently of PSR2 criteria.
>
> v2: Duh! Handle proper return to avoid breaking PSR2.
> v3: (DK):
> - better name for psr2 conditions check function
> - Don't remove FIXME block and psr2.support check.
> - Add a debug message to show us what PSR or PSR2 is
> getting enabled now we have ways to enabled PSR on
> PSR2 panels.
> - s/PSR2 disabled/PSR2 not enabled
>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index 2f685beac21b..05770790a4e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -446,6 +446,41 @@ static void hsw_psr_activate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> hsw_activate_psr1(intel_dp);
> }
>
> +static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> + const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> + &crtc_state->base.adjusted_mode;
> +
> + /*
> + * FIXME psr2_support is messed up. It's both computed
> + * dynamically during PSR enable, and extracted from sink
> + * caps during eDP detection.
> + */
> + if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_support)
> + return false;
> +
> + /* PSR2 is restricted to work with panel resolutions up to 3640x2304 */
> + if (adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay > 3640 ||
> + adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay > 2304) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, panel resolution too big\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * FIXME:enable psr2 only for y-cordinate psr2 panels
> + * After gtc implementation , remove this restriction.
> + */
> + if (!dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, panel does not support Y coordinate\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> {
> @@ -513,34 +548,9 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> return;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * FIXME psr2_support is messed up. It's both computed
> - * dynamically during PSR enable, and extracted from sink
> - * caps during eDP detection.
> - */
> - if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> - crtc_state->has_psr = true;
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - /* PSR2 is restricted to work with panel resolutions up to 3640x2304 */
> - if (adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay > 3640 ||
> - adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay > 2304) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 disabled, panel resolution too big\n");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * FIXME:enable psr2 only for y-cordinate psr2 panels
> - * After gtc implementation , remove this restriction.
> - */
> - if (!dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 disabled, panel does not support Y coordinate\n");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> crtc_state->has_psr = true;
> - crtc_state->has_psr2 = true;
> + crtc_state->has_psr2 = intel_psr2_config_valid(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling PSR%s\n", crtc_state->has_psr2 ? "2" : "");
> }
>
> static void intel_psr_activate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list