[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] test/gem_ctx_param - Use the last I915_CONTEXT_PARAM+1 for invalid tests
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Jan 11 11:46:01 UTC 2018
On 11/01/2018 11:38, Marta Lofstedt wrote:
> The invalid-param-[get|set] exploits the last I915_CONTEXT_PARAM + 1,
> to check for ABI extentsions. However, the last param was set to
> I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_BANNABLE, so when I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_PRIORITY was
> added to the next enum, the test started failing.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103107
> Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/gem_ctx_param.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/gem_ctx_param.c b/tests/gem_ctx_param.c
> index c20ae1ee..75d2a20f 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_ctx_param.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_ctx_param.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ igt_main
> * to catch ABI extensions. Don't "fix" this testcase without adding all
> * the tests for the new param first.
> */
> - arg.param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_BANNABLE + 1;
> + arg.param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_PRIORITY + 1;
>
> igt_subtest("invalid-param-get") {
> arg.ctx_id = ctx;
>
We tried before, last time AFAIR
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/187073/, but again AFAIR I think
Chris objected and would rather remove negative tests in general. Shrug,
an impasse. :I
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list