[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] test/gem_ctx_param - Use the last I915_CONTEXT_PARAM+1 for invalid tests

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Jan 11 11:46:01 UTC 2018


On 11/01/2018 11:38, Marta Lofstedt wrote:
> The invalid-param-[get|set] exploits the last I915_CONTEXT_PARAM + 1,
> to check for ABI extentsions. However, the last param was set to
> I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_BANNABLE, so when I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_PRIORITY was
> added to the next enum, the test started failing.
> 
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103107
> Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt at intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/gem_ctx_param.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/gem_ctx_param.c b/tests/gem_ctx_param.c
> index c20ae1ee..75d2a20f 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_ctx_param.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_ctx_param.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ igt_main
>   	 * to catch ABI extensions. Don't "fix" this testcase without adding all
>   	 * the tests for the new param first.
>   	 */
> -	arg.param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_BANNABLE + 1;
> +	arg.param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_PRIORITY + 1;
>   
>   	igt_subtest("invalid-param-get") {
>   		arg.ctx_id = ctx;
> 

We tried before, last time AFAIR 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/187073/, but again AFAIR I think 
Chris objected and would rather remove negative tests in general. Shrug, 
an impasse. :I

Regards,

Tvrtko


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list