[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Move irq state manipulation inside irq disabled region
Mika Kuoppala
mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com
Fri Mar 2 13:42:30 UTC 2018
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Although this state (execlists->active and engine->irq_posted) itself is
> not protected by the engine->timeline spinlock, it does conveniently
> ensure that irqs are disabled. We can use this to protect our
> manipulation of the state and so ensure that the next IRQ to arrive sees
> consistent state and (hopefully) ignores the reset engine.
>
> Suggested-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index c1a3636e94fc..0482e54c94f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -1618,10 +1618,10 @@ static void reset_common_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> GEM_TRACE("%s seqno=%x\n",
> engine->name, request ? request->global_seqno : 0);
>
> - reset_irq(engine);
> -
> spin_lock_irqsave(&engine->timeline->lock, flags);
>
> + reset_irq(engine);
> +
> /*
> * Catch up with any missed context-switch interrupts.
> *
> @@ -1636,11 +1636,11 @@ static void reset_common_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> /* Push back any incomplete requests for replay after the reset. */
> __unwind_incomplete_requests(engine);
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->timeline->lock, flags);
> -
> /* Mark all CS interrupts as complete */
> execlists->active = 0;
>
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&engine->timeline->lock, flags);
> +
> /* If the request was innocent, we leave the request in the ELSP
> * and will try to replay it on restarting. The context image may
> * have been corrupted by the reset, in which case we may have
> --
> 2.16.2
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list