[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915: Add NV12 as supported format for primary plane
Srinivas, Vidya
vidya.srinivas at intel.com
Wed Mar 7 11:27:52 UTC 2018
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Syrjälä [mailto:ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 12:30 AM
> To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas at intel.com>
> Cc: juhapekka.heikkila at gmail.com; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915: Add NV12 as supported
> format for primary plane
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:08:25AM +0000, Srinivas, Vidya wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Juha-Pekka Heikkila [mailto:juhapekka.heikkila at gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 3:35 PM
> > > To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas at intel.com>; intel-
> > > gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915: Add NV12 as
> > > supported format for primary plane
> > >
> > > On 23.02.2018 05:06, Srinivas, Vidya wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Juha-Pekka Heikkila [mailto:juhapekka.heikkila at gmail.com]
> > > >> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 7:06 PM
> > > >> To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas at intel.com>; intel-
> > > >> gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > >> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915: Add NV12 as
> > > >> supported format for primary plane
> > > >>
> > > >> On 22.02.2018 04:39, Srinivas, Vidya wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > > >>>> From: Juha-Pekka Heikkila [mailto:juhapekka.heikkila at gmail.com]
> > > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 7:52 PM
> > > >>>> To: Srinivas, Vidya <vidya.srinivas at intel.com>; intel-
> > > >>>> gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > >>>> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915: Add NV12 as
> > > >>>> supported format for primary plane
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On 21.02.2018 12:20, Vidya Srinivas wrote:
> > > >>>>> From: Chandra Konduru <chandra.konduru at intel.com>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> This patch adds NV12 to list of supported formats for primary
> > > >>>>> plane
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> v2: Rebased (Chandra Konduru)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> v3: Rebased (me)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> v4: Review comments by Ville addressed Removed the
> > > >>>>> skl_primary_formats_with_nv12 and added NV12 case in existing
> > > >>>>> skl_primary_formats
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> v5: Rebased (me)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> v6: Missed the Tested-by/Reviewed-by in the previous series
> > > >>>>> Adding the same to commit message in this version.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> v7: Review comments by Ville addressed
> > > >>>>> Restricting the NV12 for BXT and on PIPE A and B Rebased
> (me)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> v8: Rebased (me)
> > > >>>>> Modified restricting the NV12 support for both BXT and KBL.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> v9: Rebased (me)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> v10: Addressed review comments from Maarten.
> > > >>>>> Adding NV12 inside skl_primary_formats itself.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> v11: Adding Reviewed By tag from Shashank Sharma
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Tested-by: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor at intel.com>
> > > >>>>> Reviewed-by: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor at intel.com>
> > > >>>>> Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma at intel.com>
> > > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Chandra Konduru <chandra.konduru at intel.com>
> > > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Nabendu Maiti <nabendu.bikash.maiti at intel.com>
> > > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas at intel.com>
> > > >>>>> ---
> > > >>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 5 +++++
> > > >>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > >>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > >>>>> index 142dfe0..1870366 100644
> > > >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > > >>>>> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static const uint32_t skl_primary_formats[]
> = {
> > > >>>>> DRM_FORMAT_YVYU,
> > > >>>>> DRM_FORMAT_UYVY,
> > > >>>>> DRM_FORMAT_VYUY,
> > > >>>>> + DRM_FORMAT_NV12,
> > > >>>>> };
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> static const uint64_t skl_format_modifiers_noccs[] = { @@
> > > >>>>> -13282,6
> > > >>>>> +13283,10 @@ intel_primary_plane_create(struct
> > > >>>>> +drm_i915_private
> > > >>>> *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
> > > >>>>> intel_primary_formats = skl_primary_formats;
> > > >>>>> num_formats = ARRAY_SIZE(skl_primary_formats);
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> + if ((INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == 9 && pipe == PIPE_C)
> > > &&
> > > >>>>> + !IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> > > >>>>> + num_formats -= 1;
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> This doesn't look future proof solution. This creates invisible
> > > >>>> dependency where it is required NV12 is last item in list of
> formats.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Initially we had a different array for this. But as a part of
> > > >>> one of the review comments, I made this change.
> > > >>
> > > >> I did see Maarten's comment on your older patch. In my opinion
> > > >> having two lists would be more clear. Regardless of opinions on
> > > >> which is better you maybe anyway want to reconsider this piece of
> > > >> code as this expose
> > > >> NV12 also for Skylake platform.
> > > >
> > > > Maarten, could you please add your inputs as well?
> > > > I will change the patch according to what we decide.
> > > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > If other's see it better to keep it in one list I'm ok for that. To
> > > me it just feel like accident waiting to happen if this list is
> > > changed at later time for different reasons.
> > >
> > > My other comment about Skylake platform, you shouldn't enable NV12
> > > for Skylake platform where its documented to have problems (I mean
> > > not all users of skl_* list but rule out probably something like
> > > IS_SKYLAKE(..)). For this reason this patch shouldn't be used as is.
> > > This same story applies for patch #14 of this series, NV12 shouldn't
> > > be enabled on Skylake platform.
> >
> > Thank you. Sure, I will just wait for Maarten's input on the array.
> > For SKL, I will make the change in the patch and float.
>
> Pls add skl_plane_has_nv12() or something along those lines (to match the
> skl_plane_has_ccs()).
>
> Also https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/39390/ should make life a bit
> easier for anyone dealing with SKL plane init code by removing this silly code
> duplication we have going on currently.
>
Thank you. Will make the changes and float the patches.
Regards
Vidya
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list