[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/i915: misc fixes in headers (RESEND)

[Arkadiusz Hiler]

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:22:55PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Mar 2018 13:58:48 +0100, Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 02:20:41PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Thu, 08 Mar 2018, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-03-08 09:50:33)
> > > >> This is a resend, to make patchwork happy.
> > > >> All patches already been reviewed.
> > > >
> > > > It's still being ignored. :(
> > > 
> > > At least patchwork detected this as a series [1], often that's the
> > > problem.
> > 
> > 
> > Patchwork is not seeing patch 4/4, and due to its weird logic, it's
> > still waiting for it instead of considering the series "incomplete".
> > 
> > Looking at the series page, it doesn't even have a revision number.
> > 
> > This causes the pw REST api to show the series as one with 0 patches
> > when listing series, there's no series-new-revision event (CI is
> > watching that), and it also causes the below:
> > 
> > > I tried to start testing manually from patchwork, it gives me "failed!".
> > 
> > 
> > Arek checked the logs and patch 4/4 hasn't been received by pw at
> > all. Maybe it's still on the way, who knows.
> > 
> 
> I'm not sure if this is related, but list archive decided to assign
> patch 1/4 [1] to old series [2] instead new one [3]
> 
> [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/158080.html
> [2] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/thread.html#157974
> [3] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/thread.html#158081
> 
> ps. patch 4/4 is already in archive [4]
> 
> [4] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2018-March/158082.html

The patch got lost in time and space and has never reached patchwork's
mail server.

I feed the patchwork with a copy of the mail manually. Expect results soon.

-- 
Cheers,
Arek