[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove the impedance mismatch around intel_engine_enable_signaling

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Fri Mar 9 17:24:33 UTC 2018


On 08/03/2018 14:07, Chris Wilson wrote:
> There is some redundancy between dma_fence->ops->enable_signaling (via
> i915_fence_enable_signaling) and our backend,
> intel_engine_enable_signaling() in that both levels recheck the fence
> status multiple times. If we convert intel_engine_enable_signaling() to
> return the information desired by dma_fence->ops->enable_signaling, we
> can reduce i915_fence_enable_signaling to a simple stub and avoid
> trying to reinterpret the same information.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c      |  6 +-----
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h  |  2 +-
>   3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> index d437beac3969..2a841800d4cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> @@ -59,11 +59,7 @@ static bool i915_fence_signaled(struct dma_fence *fence)
>   
>   static bool i915_fence_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence)
>   {
> -	if (i915_fence_signaled(fence))
> -		return false;

This was based on hws seqno check...

> -
> -	intel_engine_enable_signaling(to_request(fence), true);
> -	return !i915_fence_signaled(fence);
> +	return intel_engine_enable_signaling(to_request(fence), true);
>   }
>   
>   static signed long i915_fence_wait(struct dma_fence *fence,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
> index 1f79e7a47433..671a6d61e29d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
> @@ -730,10 +730,11 @@ static void insert_signal(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b,
>   	list_add(&request->signaling.link, &iter->signaling.link);
>   }
>   
> -void intel_engine_enable_signaling(struct i915_request *request, bool wakeup)
> +bool intel_engine_enable_signaling(struct i915_request *request, bool wakeup)
>   {
>   	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = request->engine;
>   	struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = &engine->breadcrumbs;
> +	struct intel_wait *wait = &request->signaling.wait;
>   	u32 seqno;
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -750,12 +751,12 @@ void intel_engine_enable_signaling(struct i915_request *request, bool wakeup)
>   
>   	seqno = i915_request_global_seqno(request);
>   	if (!seqno) /* will be enabled later upon execution */
> -		return;
> +		return true;
>   
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(request->signaling.wait.seqno);
> -	request->signaling.wait.tsk = b->signaler;
> -	request->signaling.wait.request = request;
> -	request->signaling.wait.seqno = seqno;
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(wait->seqno);
> +	wait->tsk = b->signaler;
> +	wait->request = request;
> +	wait->seqno = seqno;
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Add ourselves into the list of waiters, but registering our
> @@ -768,11 +769,15 @@ void intel_engine_enable_signaling(struct i915_request *request, bool wakeup)
>   	 */
>   	spin_lock(&b->rb_lock);
>   	insert_signal(b, request, seqno);
> -	wakeup &= __intel_engine_add_wait(engine, &request->signaling.wait);
> +	wakeup &= __intel_engine_add_wait(engine, wait);
>   	spin_unlock(&b->rb_lock);
>   
> -	if (wakeup)
> +	if (wakeup) {
>   		wake_up_process(b->signaler);
> +		return !intel_wait_complete(wait);

... and would now be based on breadcrumb waiter waking up and removing 
itself from the tree.

So some potential latency where it wasn't before, well, enable-disable 
signalling cycles actually.

If I got it right.. breadcrumbs code confuses me massively these days.

Regards,

Tvrtko

> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
>   }
>   
>   void intel_engine_cancel_signaling(struct i915_request *request)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> index 0320c2c4cfba..aa34b2ff04bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
> @@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ bool intel_engine_add_wait(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>   			   struct intel_wait *wait);
>   void intel_engine_remove_wait(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>   			      struct intel_wait *wait);
> -void intel_engine_enable_signaling(struct i915_request *request, bool wakeup);
> +bool intel_engine_enable_signaling(struct i915_request *request, bool wakeup);
>   void intel_engine_cancel_signaling(struct i915_request *request);
>   
>   static inline bool intel_engine_has_waiter(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list