[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/stolen: Intepret reserved_base=0 as deduce from top

[Chris Wilson]

On my j1900 Valleyview, and on both of CI's, if I allocate above the power
context (as allotted by PCBR) then the objects are not accessed. For
example, if it is a ringbuffer, then the commands are not executed,
causing a GPU hang with no breadcrumb advancement. On inspection,
GEN6_STOLEN_RESERVED is enabled, but has base==0 which we interpret a
being invalid. However, it fits neatly in after the powercontext if we
interpret base==0 as meaning allocate from top instead, the GPU doesn't
hang on boot!

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
index b04e2551bae6..1bd542977e4c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
@@ -386,12 +386,13 @@ int i915_gem_init_stolen(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		break;
 	}
 
-	/* It is possible for the reserved base to be zero, but the register
-	 * field for size doesn't have a zero option. */
-	if (reserved_base == 0) {
-		reserved_size = 0;
-		reserved_base = stolen_top;
-	}
+	/*
+	 * It is possible for the reserved base to be zero, but the register
+	 * field for size doesn't have a zero option. Experience says they
+	 * mean allocate from top.
+	 */
+	if (reserved_base == 0)
+		reserved_base = stolen_top - reserved_size;
 
 	dev_priv->dsm_reserved =
 		(struct resource) DEFINE_RES_MEM(reserved_base, reserved_size);
-- 
2.16.2