[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v12 1/6] drm/i915/guc: Rename guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset

[Joonas Lahtinen]

Quoting Jackie Li (2018-03-02 02:16:41)
> GuC related exported functions should start with "intel_guc_" prefix and
> pass intel_guc as the first parameter since its GuC related. Current
> guc_ggtt_offset() failed to follow this code convention and this is a
> problem for future patches that needs to access intel_guc data to verify
> the GGTT offset against the GuC WOPCM top.
> 
> This patch renames the guc_ggtt_offset to intel_guc_ggtt_offset and updates
> the related code to pass intel_guc pointer to this function call, so that
> we can have a unified coding style for GuC code and also enable the future
> patches to get GuC related data from intel_guc to do the offset
> verification. Meanwhile, this patch also moves the GUC_GGTT_TOP from
> intel_guc_regs.h to intel_guc.h since it is not GuC register related
> definition.
> 
> v8:
>  - Fixed coding style issues and moved GUC_GGTT_TOP to intel_guc.h (Sagar)
>  - Updated commit message to explain to reason and motivation to add
>    intel_guc as the first parameter of intel_guc_ggtt_offset (Chris)
> 
> v9:
>  - Fixed code alignment issue due to line break (Chris)
> 
> v10:
>  - Removed unnecessary comments, redundant code and avoided reuse variable
>    to avoid potential issues (Joonas)
> 
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com> (v8)
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com> (v9)
> Signed-off-by: Jackie Li <yaodong.li at intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com> (v11)

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>

Regards, Joonas