[Intel-gfx] [RFC] drm/i915/psr: Remove PSR active flag from debugfs

[Souza, Jose]

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 21:42 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> The flag becomes misleading with flips and cursor moves not modifying
> it's
> state as HW takes care of exiting PSR (when HW tracking is enabled)
> 
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index c4cc8fef11a0..416dcb703e23 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2565,7 +2565,6 @@ static int i915_edp_psr_status(struct seq_file
> *m, void *data)
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->psr.lock);
>  	seq_printf(m, "Enabled: %s\n", yesno((bool)dev_priv-
> >psr.enabled));
> -	seq_printf(m, "Active: %s\n", yesno(dev_priv->psr.active));

Maybe would be better rename to something else, like "Hardware
activated/enabled".

>  	seq_printf(m, "Busy frontbuffer bits: 0x%03x\n",
>  		   dev_priv->psr.busy_frontbuffer_bits);
>  	seq_printf(m, "Re-enable work scheduled: %s\n",