[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/guc: Update syntax of GuC log functions
Michał Winiarski
michal.winiarski at intel.com
Wed Mar 14 16:56:01 UTC 2018
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 02:45:39PM +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> We moved GuC log related data and code to separate files and
> definition but we didn't change functions syntax to follow
> object-verb pattern. Let's fix that before we continue with
> next round of code refactoring.
>
> v2: rebased
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
One more comment, since I just noticed this while rebasing my guc patches on
this rename.
What about guc actions?
We now have guc_log_flush_complete, guc_log_flush and guc_log_control that are
using intel_guc rather than intel_guc_log.
Which is reasonable - because those don't touch guc->log, but it's also
inconsistent (I'm also adding guc_log_flush_irq_enable).
If you want to follow object-verb pattern, you should either rename or pass
intel_guc_log and do the log_to_guc dance there.
-Michał
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc.c | 8 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 203 +++++++++++++++++++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.h | 18 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 4 +-
> 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 111 deletions(-)
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list