[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Unify naming of private GuC action functions

[Michal Wajdeczko]

We should avoid using guc_log prefix for functions that don't
operate on GuC log, but rather request action from the GuC.
Better to use guc_action prefix.

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski at intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
index b9c7bd7..457168a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_log.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
  * registers value.
  */
 
-static int guc_log_flush_complete(struct intel_guc *guc)
+static int guc_action_flush_log_complete(struct intel_guc *guc)
 {
 	u32 action[] = {
 		INTEL_GUC_ACTION_LOG_BUFFER_FILE_FLUSH_COMPLETE
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static int guc_log_flush_complete(struct intel_guc *guc)
 	return intel_guc_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
 }
 
-static int guc_log_flush(struct intel_guc *guc)
+static int guc_action_flush_log(struct intel_guc *guc)
 {
 	u32 action[] = {
 		INTEL_GUC_ACTION_FORCE_LOG_BUFFER_FLUSH,
@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ static int guc_log_flush(struct intel_guc *guc)
 	return intel_guc_send(guc, action, ARRAY_SIZE(action));
 }
 
-static int guc_log_control(struct intel_guc *guc, bool enable, u32 verbosity)
+static int guc_action_enable_log(struct intel_guc *guc, bool enable,
+				 u32 verbosity)
 {
 	union guc_log_control control_val = {
 		{
@@ -525,7 +526,7 @@ static void guc_log_capture_logs(struct intel_guc *guc)
 	 * time, so get/put should be really quick.
 	 */
 	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
-	guc_log_flush_complete(guc);
+	guc_action_flush_log_complete(guc);
 	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
 }
 
@@ -541,7 +542,7 @@ static void guc_flush_logs(struct intel_guc *guc)
 
 	/* Ask GuC to update the log buffer state */
 	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
-	guc_log_flush(guc);
+	guc_action_flush_log(guc);
 	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
 
 	/* GuC would have updated log buffer by now, so capture it */
@@ -639,10 +640,11 @@ int intel_guc_log_control_set(struct intel_guc *guc, u64 val)
 	}
 
 	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
-	ret = guc_log_control(guc, enabled, LOG_LEVEL_TO_VERBOSITY(val));
+	ret = guc_action_enable_log(guc, enabled, LOG_LEVEL_TO_VERBOSITY(val));
 	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
 	if (ret) {
-		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("guc_log_control action failed %d\n", ret);
+		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("GuC action to %s log failed (%d)\n",
+				 enabled ? "enable" : "disable", ret);
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
-- 
1.9.1