[Intel-gfx] [maintainer-tools PATCH] doc: how to become a drm-intel committer
jani.nikula at intel.com
Thu Mar 15 15:32:53 UTC 2018
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 05:11:02PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Until now, the drm-intel commit access have been handed out ad hoc,
>> without transparency, consistency, or fairness. With pressure to add
>> more committers, this is no longer tenable, if it ever was. Document the
>> requirements and expectations around becoming a drm-intel committer.
>> The Linux kernel operates in a model where, by and large, only
>> maintainers commit patches. Maintainer teams are no longer rare, but the
>> drm-intel and drm-misc maintainer/committer model is definitely an
>> The drm-intel maintainers believe that a reasonable level of experience
>> and track record of working on the driver, as well as actively engaging
>> in the community upstream, are necessary before becoming a
>> committer. While the requirements outlined here may seem strict in
>> contrast with many projects, they are extremely liberal by kernel
>> Finally, no rules are carved in stone. We fully expect the requirements
>> to be adjusted later. However, it will be much easier to start strict
>> and relax the requirements later than the other way round.
>> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo at padovan.org>
>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org>
>> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com>
>> Cc: dim-tools at lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> I've chatted for a few hours with Joonas, and I think before we can
> discuss the proposed document here itself, we first need to reach some
> agreement on why we even have commit rights. I think there's a very wide
> range of answers to that questions, and of course with different goals you
> end up with completely different rules about how to handle commit rights.
> Joonas suggested we first discuss this internally, perhaps with the
> maintainers, Kimmo and me.
Fine. I would rather have discussed this transparently out in the
open. That was, after all, the purpose of sending this out.
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx