[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 27/36] drm/i915: Split control of rps and rc6
Sagar Arun Kamble
sagar.a.kamble at intel.com
Fri Mar 16 13:03:03 UTC 2018
On 3/16/2018 2:22 PM, Sagar Arun Kamble wrote:
>
>
> On 3/14/2018 3:07 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> Allow ourselves to individually toggle rps or rc6. This will be used
>> later when we want to enable rps/rc6 at different phases during the
>> device bring up.
>>
>> Whilst here, convert the intel_$verb_gt_powersave over to
>> intel_gt_pm_$verb scheme.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> <snip>
>> +void intel_gt_pm_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> {
>> struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt_pm.rps;
>> @@ -2475,22 +2477,13 @@ void intel_init_gt_powersave(struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> /* Finally allow us to boost to max by default */
>> rps->boost_freq = rps->max_freq;
>> - mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
>> -}
>> -
>> -static inline void intel_enable_llc_pstate(struct drm_i915_private
>> *i915)
>> -{
>> - lockdep_assert_held(&i915->gt_pm.rps.lock);
>> -
>> - if (i915->gt_pm.llc_pstate.enabled)
>> - return;
>> -
>> - gen6_update_ring_freq(i915);
>> + if (HAS_LLC(dev_priv))
>> + gen6_update_ring_freq(dev_priv);
> Ring frequency table update has to be done on resuming from sleep or
> reset as well hence we will
not required on resume from reset :)
> need to possibly move it either __enable_rps or
> gt_pm_sanitize(provided we guard against "rps initialized")
> Verified on my SKL system. Otherwise, patch looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Sagar
>> - i915->gt_pm.llc_pstate.enabled = true;
>> + mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
>> }
>> -static void intel_enable_rc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +static void __enable_rc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> {
>> lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->gt_pm.rps.lock);
>> @@ -2511,7 +2504,7 @@ static void intel_enable_rc6(struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> dev_priv->gt_pm.rc6.enabled = true;
>> }
>> -static void intel_enable_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +static void __enable_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> {
>> struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt_pm.rps;
>> @@ -2546,37 +2539,27 @@ static void intel_enable_rps(struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> rps->enabled = true;
>> }
>> -void intel_enable_gt_powersave(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +void intel_gt_pm_enable_rc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> {
>> - /* Powersaving is controlled by the host when inside a VM */
>> - if (intel_vgpu_active(dev_priv))
>> + if (!HAS_RC6(dev_priv))
>> return;
>> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->gt_pm.rps.lock);
>> -
>> - if (HAS_RC6(dev_priv))
>> - intel_enable_rc6(dev_priv);
>> - if (HAS_RPS(dev_priv))
>> - intel_enable_rps(dev_priv);
>> - if (HAS_LLC(dev_priv))
>> - intel_enable_llc_pstate(dev_priv);
>> -
>> + __enable_rc6(dev_priv);
>> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->gt_pm.rps.lock);
>> }
>> -static inline void intel_disable_llc_pstate(struct
>> drm_i915_private *i915)
>> +void intel_gt_pm_enable_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> {
>> - lockdep_assert_held(&i915->gt_pm.rps.lock);
>> -
>> - if (!i915->gt_pm.llc_pstate.enabled)
>> + if (!HAS_RPS(dev_priv))
>> return;
>> - /* Currently there is no HW configuration to be done to
>> disable. */
>> -
>> - i915->gt_pm.llc_pstate.enabled = false;
>> + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->gt_pm.rps.lock);
>> + __enable_rps(dev_priv);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->gt_pm.rps.lock);
>> }
>> -static void intel_disable_rc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +static void __disable_rc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> {
>> lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->gt_pm.rps.lock);
>> @@ -2595,7 +2578,14 @@ static void intel_disable_rc6(struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> dev_priv->gt_pm.rc6.enabled = false;
>> }
>> -static void intel_disable_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +void intel_gt_pm_disable_rc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +{
>> + mutex_lock(&dev_priv->gt_pm.rps.lock);
>> + __disable_rc6(dev_priv);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->gt_pm.rps.lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __disable_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> {
>> lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->gt_pm.rps.lock);
>> @@ -2616,19 +2606,14 @@ static void intel_disable_rps(struct
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> dev_priv->gt_pm.rps.enabled = false;
>> }
>> -void intel_disable_gt_powersave(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +void intel_gt_pm_disable_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> {
>> mutex_lock(&dev_priv->gt_pm.rps.lock);
>> -
>> - intel_disable_rc6(dev_priv);
>> - intel_disable_rps(dev_priv);
>> - if (HAS_LLC(dev_priv))
>> - intel_disable_llc_pstate(dev_priv);
>> -
>> + __disable_rps(dev_priv);
>> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->gt_pm.rps.lock);
>> }
>> -void intel_cleanup_gt_powersave(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> +void intel_gt_pm_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> {
>> if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv))
>> valleyview_cleanup_gt_powersave(dev_priv);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gt_pm.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gt_pm.h
>> index 722325bbb6cc..5975c63f46bf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gt_pm.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_gt_pm.h
>> @@ -31,12 +31,16 @@ struct intel_rps_client;
>> void intel_gpu_ips_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> void intel_gpu_ips_teardown(void);
>> -void intel_sanitize_gt_powersave(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> +void intel_gt_pm_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> -void intel_init_gt_powersave(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> -void intel_enable_gt_powersave(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> -void intel_disable_gt_powersave(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> -void intel_cleanup_gt_powersave(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> +void intel_gt_pm_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> +void intel_gt_pm_fini(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> +
>> +void intel_gt_pm_enable_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> +void intel_gt_pm_disable_rps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> +
>> +void intel_gt_pm_enable_rc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> +void intel_gt_pm_disable_rc6(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
>> void intel_gt_pm_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> u32 pm_iir);
>
--
Thanks,
Sagar
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list