[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt 0/8] Non-Intel test suite fixes
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Tue Mar 20 11:32:17 UTC 2018
On Monday, 19 March 2018 18:41:05 EET Ulrich Hecht wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:45:36PM +0100, Ulrich Hecht wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >> I have run the tests on a Renesas R-Car M3-W's DU device, and have found
> >> a number of false negatives that mostly stem from use of Intel-specifics
> >> without checking if that makes sense first. So here's a bunch of fixes
> >> for those, hope they are generic enough for upstreaming.
> > Nice, other people using this! Do you plan to maintain this actively going
> > forward, or is this more a one-off effort?
> For now, this is just an attempt at evaluating if this works for us.
> It has caught a few things that look like legitimate bugs to me,
That's good news ! (Not that I'm happy that we have bugs, but catching them
shows that igt is useful for us). I hope this will help convincing management
that we should keep contributing to igt going forward.
Ulrich, for the record, I agree with all of Daniel's and Ville's comments
posted so far.
More information about the Intel-gfx