[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt 2/8] tests/kms_panel_fitting: check for i915 before checking version

[Daniel Vetter]

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 01:24:09PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Ulrich,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Thursday, 15 March 2018 16:45:38 EET Ulrich Hecht wrote:
> > Fixes false negatives on non-i915 platforms.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <ulrich.hecht+renesas at gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/kms_panel_fitting.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c b/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c
> > index b3cee22..6d0be50 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_panel_fitting.c
> > @@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ static void test_atomic_fastset(igt_display_t *display)
> >  		igt_set_module_param_int("fastboot", 1);
> > 
> >  	igt_require(display->is_atomic);
> > +	igt_require(is_i915_device(display->drm_fd));
> >  	igt_require(intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(display->drm_fd)) >= 5);
> 
> I'm fine with this patch as a quick fix, but what in this test is Intel-
> specific ? Can't we replace the Intel generation check with a different 
> feature check ?

There's some checks in there that we can do certain panel fitter mode
changes without a modeset (throught ALLOW_MODESET for atomic commits).
That's 100% encoding intel hw constraints: Our hw can disable the panel
fitter without a modest (so going from upscaled -> native resolution), but
not any of the other changes (native -> upscaled or 2 different upscaled
versions).
-Daniel

> 
> >  	for_each_pipe_with_valid_output(display, pipe, output) {
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch