[Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH i-g-t 3/3] tests: Add vc4 test suite

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:44:10PM +0200, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 04:18:54PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:42:02PM +0200, Petri Latvala wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 03:21:29PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > Add some various test suites relevant for the vc4 drm driver.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at bootlin.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  tests/vc4_ci/vc4-chamelium-fast.testlist |  4 ++++
> > > >  tests/vc4_ci/vc4-chamelium.testlist      |  9 ++++++++
> > > >  tests/vc4_ci/vc4.testlist                | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 tests/vc4_ci/vc4-chamelium-fast.testlist
> > > >  create mode 100644 tests/vc4_ci/vc4-chamelium.testlist
> > > >  create mode 100644 tests/vc4_ci/vc4.testlist
> > > 
> > > Can you also add a README explaining where vc4_ci results can be found
> > > (or statement for the lack of a public view) and how these testlist
> > > files are used?
> > 
> > There isn't any publicly visible CI plan at the moment (that I know
> > of). This patch was more to get a list of meaningful tests into the
> > tree so that the various people involved could share the tests run for
> > now at least. I'm not sure what the policy is for that to be honest.
> 
> From IGT's side the policy is that the people who need such a
> directory will set it up and it becomes their turf, in both
> directions. Their responsibility to maintain, and their ack is
> required for changes.

Ok, so I guess it would become mostly Eric's garden then :)

Eric, are you ok with such a test suite?

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com