[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: prefer INTEL_GEN() over INTEL_INFO()->gen
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Wed Mar 21 14:14:44 UTC 2018
On Wed, 21 Mar 2018, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> Quoting Jani Nikula (2018-03-21 14:07:54)
>> Fix the last two direct ->gen usages.
>>
>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> index a504281e2afa..af538c4a3aeb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
>> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ void intel_device_info_dump(const struct intel_device_info *info,
>> INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv),
>> INTEL_REVID(dev_priv),
>> intel_platform_name(info->platform),
>> - info->gen);
>> + INTEL_GEN(dev_priv));
>
> This is wrong, this should be from the local intel_device_info *info.
> (Passed in from the caller, so dev_priv is very wrong here, and yes the
> INTEL_foo() above are on my hit list :)
Contemplated that. I guess you'll need to remove them for turning
intel_device_info into a pointer rather than a copy in dev_priv?
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list