[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Remove local timeline var from submit/unsubmit
Mika Kuoppala
mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com
Thu Mar 22 13:24:13 UTC 2018
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Both request_submit and request_unsubmit deal with transferring the
> request from the client's timeline onto the execution timeline and back
> again. As both functions deal with a pair of timeline's, using a
> shorthand for just one of them is slightly confusing, especially as the
The amount confusion is correlated with readers previous knowledge about
timelines. Slightly is an understatement for the newcomers but
we can accept that as a good amount of confusion, on average.
> different functions use the shorthand for the alternate timeline.
> Instead, use the full version of each timeline so it should be easier to
> keep track of the transfer between the request/client and the engine.
>
I pondered if the comment can even be removed on this, much
easier to read, version. But as the comment gives a
proper names to timelines, it has value.
Only one thing remains is that should the 'client's timeline'
be changed to 'per context timeline' on this commit msg,
to reflect the comment in the code.
> v2: Refactor the common lock+list_move
> v3: Be clear we require the other timeline list to be locked as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> index 2325886d1d55..854af07994f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> @@ -492,10 +492,20 @@ static u32 timeline_get_seqno(struct intel_timeline *tl)
> return ++tl->seqno;
> }
>
> +static void move_to_timeline(struct i915_request *request,
> + struct intel_timeline *timeline)
> +{
> + GEM_BUG_ON(request->timeline == request->engine->timeline);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&request->engine->timeline->lock);
> +
> + spin_lock(&request->timeline->lock);
> + list_move_tail(&request->link, &timeline->requests);
> + spin_unlock(&request->timeline->lock);
> +}
> +
> void __i915_request_submit(struct i915_request *request)
> {
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine = request->engine;
> - struct intel_timeline *timeline;
> u32 seqno;
>
> GEM_TRACE("%s fence %llx:%d -> global_seqno %d\n",
> @@ -506,12 +516,9 @@ void __i915_request_submit(struct i915_request *request)
> GEM_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
> lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline->lock);
>
> - /* Transfer from per-context onto the global per-engine timeline */
> - timeline = engine->timeline;
> - GEM_BUG_ON(timeline == request->timeline);
> GEM_BUG_ON(request->global_seqno);
>
> - seqno = timeline_get_seqno(timeline);
> + seqno = timeline_get_seqno(engine->timeline);
> GEM_BUG_ON(!seqno);
> GEM_BUG_ON(i915_seqno_passed(intel_engine_get_seqno(engine), seqno));
>
> @@ -525,9 +532,8 @@ void __i915_request_submit(struct i915_request *request)
> engine->emit_breadcrumb(request,
> request->ring->vaddr + request->postfix);
>
> - spin_lock(&request->timeline->lock);
> - list_move_tail(&request->link, &timeline->requests);
> - spin_unlock(&request->timeline->lock);
> + /* Transfer from per-context onto the global per-engine timeline */
> + move_to_timeline(request, engine->timeline);
>
> trace_i915_request_execute(request);
>
> @@ -550,7 +556,6 @@ void i915_request_submit(struct i915_request *request)
> void __i915_request_unsubmit(struct i915_request *request)
> {
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine = request->engine;
> - struct intel_timeline *timeline;
>
> GEM_TRACE("%s fence %llx:%d <- global_seqno %d\n",
> request->engine->name,
> @@ -578,12 +583,7 @@ void __i915_request_unsubmit(struct i915_request *request)
> spin_unlock(&request->lock);
>
> /* Transfer back from the global per-engine timeline to per-context */
> - timeline = request->timeline;
> - GEM_BUG_ON(timeline == engine->timeline);
> -
> - spin_lock(&timeline->lock);
> - list_move(&request->link, &timeline->requests);
> - spin_unlock(&timeline->lock);
> + move_to_timeline(request, request->timeline);
>
> /*
> * We don't need to wake_up any waiters on request->execute, they
> --
> 2.16.2
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list