[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915/psr: Tie PSR2 support to Y coordinate requirement
Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com
Sat Mar 24 02:34:34 UTC 2018
On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 23:51 +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 15:59 -0700, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 14:48 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > > Move to only one place the sink requirements that the actual driver
> > > needs to enable PSR2.
> > >
> > > Also intel_psr2_config_valid() is called every time the crtc config
> > > is computed, wasting some time every time it was checking for
> > > Y coordinate requirement.
> > >
> > > This allow us to nuke y_cord_support and some of VSC setup code
> > > that
> > > was handling a scenario that would never happen(PSR2 without Y
> > > coordinate).
> > >
> > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 -
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++-----------
> > > ------------
> > > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > index 7fe00509e51a..cce32686fd75 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > @@ -603,7 +603,6 @@ struct i915_psr {
> > > unsigned busy_frontbuffer_bits;
> > > bool psr2_support;
> > > bool link_standby;
> > > - bool y_cord_support;
> > > bool colorimetry_support;
> > > bool alpm;
> > > bool has_hw_tracking;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > index d46320a451d9..23f38ab10636 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static void psr_aux_io_power_put(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > > intel_display_power_put(dev_priv,
> > > psr_aux_domain(intel_dp));
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static bool intel_dp_get_y_cord_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > +static bool intel_dp_get_y_coord_required(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > > {
> > > uint8_t psr_caps = 0;
> > >
> > > @@ -130,22 +130,29 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > > drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR_SUPPORT, intel_dp-
> > > >psr_dpcd,
> > > sizeof(intel_dp->psr_dpcd));
> > >
> > > - if (intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0] & DP_PSR_IS_SUPPORTED) {
> > > + if (intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0]) {
> > > dev_priv->psr.sink_support = true;
> > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Detected EDP PSR Panel.\n");
> > > }
> > >
> > > if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9 &&
> > > - (intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0] & DP_PSR2_IS_SUPPORTED)) {
> > > -
> > > - dev_priv->psr.sink_support = true;
> > > - dev_priv->psr.psr2_support = true;
> > > + (intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0] ==
> > > DP_PSR2_WITH_Y_COORD_IS_SUPPORTED)) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * All panels that supports PSR version 03h (PSR2
> > > +
> > > + * Y-coordinate) can handle Y-coordinates in VSC
> > > but we are
> > > + * only sure that it is going to be used when
> > > required by the
> > > + * panel. This way panel is capable to do
> > > selective update
> > > + * without a aux frame sync.
> >
> > Can you cite this from the spec please? just the "panel is capable to
> > do
> > selective update without a aux frame sync" part. Or you could just
> > remove that line so that we can get this patch reviewed and merged.
>
> There is no such statement in spec like this, the closest that it have
> is:
> "When the Source device includes the optional Y-coordinate in the SDP
> for PSR2 Operation, as described in Table 6-12, the Sink device can
> implement a lower-precision GTC Slave function, as described in Table
> 7-1."
>
> But we know that this works by all the previous tests when enabling
> PSR2 and I also tested it.
Please do update the comment to say so. Do you know if these tests for
PSR2 selective update are in IGT? Or were these manual tests?
Rodrigo/Vathsala, any idea how selective update was and can be tested?
The patch as such makes sense to me
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com> if you
update the comment.
>
> >
> >
> > > + *
> > > + * To support PSR version 02h and PSR version 03h
> > > without
> > > + * Y-coordinate requirement panels we would need
> > > to enable
> > > + * GTC first.
> > > + */
> > > + dev_priv->psr.psr2_support =
> > > intel_dp_get_y_coord_required(intel_dp);
> > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 %s on sink",
> > > dev_priv->psr.psr2_support ?
> > > "supported" : "not supported");
> > >
> > > if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> > > - dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support =
> > > - intel_dp_get_y_cord_status(intel_d
> > > p);
> > > dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support =
> > > intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status(in
> > > tel_dp);
> > > dev_priv->psr.alpm =
> > > @@ -191,16 +198,12 @@ static void hsw_psr_setup_vsc(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp,
> > > memset(&psr_vsc, 0, sizeof(psr_vsc));
> > > psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB0 = 0;
> > > psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB1 = 0x7;
> > > - if (dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support &&
> > > - dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
> > > + if (dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support) {
> > > psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x5;
> > > psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0x13;
> > > - } else if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
> > > + } else {
> > > psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x4;
> > > psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0xe;
> > > - } else {
> > > - psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB2 = 0x3;
> > > - psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB3 = 0xc;
> > > }
> > > } else {
> > > /* Prepare VSC packet as per EDP 1.3 spec, Table
> > > 3.10 */
> > > @@ -458,15 +461,6 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - /*
> > > - * FIXME:enable psr2 only for y-cordinate psr2 panels
> > > - * After gtc implementation , remove this restriction.
> > > - */
> > > - if (!dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support) {
> > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, panel does not
> > > support Y coordinate\n");
> > > - return false;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -566,7 +560,6 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > struct drm_device *dev = dig_port->base.base.dev;
> > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> > > enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state-
> > > >cpu_transcoder;
> > > - u32 chicken;
> > >
> > > psr_aux_io_power_get(intel_dp);
> > >
> > > @@ -577,9 +570,8 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > hsw_psr_setup_aux(intel_dp);
> > >
> > > if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) {
> > > - chicken = PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER;
> > > - if (dev_priv->psr.y_cord_support)
> > > - chicken |= PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT;
> > > + u32 chicken = PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER
> > > + | PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT;
> > > I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder),
> > > chicken);
> > >
> > > I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG,
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list