[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/7] drm/i915/uc: Disable GuC submission during sanitize
Sagar Arun Kamble
sagar.a.kamble at intel.com
Mon Mar 26 10:36:05 UTC 2018
On 3/23/2018 8:44 PM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> We should not leave GuC submission enabled after sanitize,
> as we are going to reset all GuC/HuC hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble at intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Either we need now destroy the doorbells cleanly or remove the below
comment from clients_doorbell_fini:
/*
* By the time we're here, GuC has already been reset.
* Instead of trying (in vain) to communicate with it, let's just
* cleanup the doorbell HW and our internal state.
*/
One additional thing I feel we should do now is remove uc_suspend|resume
from gem_suspend|resume
because we don't want to do any GuC actions once we suspend it.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> index 34f8a2c..2389828 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,9 @@ void intel_uc_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>
> GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GUC(i915));
>
> + if (USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv))
> + intel_guc_submission_disable(guc);
> +
> guc_disable_communication(guc);
>
> intel_huc_sanitize(huc);
--
Thanks,
Sagar
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list