[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Include the HW breadcrumb whenever we trace the global_seqno
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Mar 29 08:42:52 UTC 2018
On 27/03/2018 22:01, Chris Wilson wrote:
> When we include a request's global_seqno in a GEM_TRACE it often helps
> to know how that relates to the current breadcrumb as seen by the
> hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 6 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> index 2314a26cd7f8..585242831974 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
> @@ -214,8 +214,11 @@ static int reset_all_global_seqno(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 seqno)
> struct i915_gem_timeline *timeline;
> struct intel_timeline *tl = engine->timeline;
>
> - GEM_TRACE("%s seqno %d -> %d\n",
> - engine->name, tl->seqno, seqno);
> + GEM_TRACE("%s seqno %d (current %d) -> %d\n",
> + engine->name,
> + tl->seqno,
> + intel_engine_get_seqno(engine),
> + seqno);
>
> if (!i915_seqno_passed(seqno, tl->seqno)) {
> /* Flush any waiters before we reuse the seqno */
> @@ -386,10 +389,11 @@ static void i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *request)
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine = request->engine;
> struct i915_gem_active *active, *next;
>
> - GEM_TRACE("%s(%d) fence %llx:%d, global_seqno %d\n",
> - engine->name, intel_engine_get_seqno(engine),
> + GEM_TRACE("%s fence %llx:%d, global_seqno %d, current %d\n",
> + engine->name,
> request->fence.context, request->fence.seqno,
> - request->global_seqno);
> + request->global_seqno,
> + intel_engine_get_seqno(engine));
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&request->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
> GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_sw_fence_signaled(&request->submit));
> @@ -508,10 +512,11 @@ void __i915_request_submit(struct i915_request *request)
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine = request->engine;
> u32 seqno;
>
> - GEM_TRACE("%s fence %llx:%d -> global_seqno %d\n",
> - request->engine->name,
> + GEM_TRACE("%s fence %llx:%d -> global_seqno %d, current %d\n",
> + engine->name,
> request->fence.context, request->fence.seqno,
> - engine->timeline->seqno + 1);
> + engine->timeline->seqno + 1,
> + intel_engine_get_seqno(engine));
>
> GEM_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
> lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline->lock);
> @@ -557,10 +562,11 @@ void __i915_request_unsubmit(struct i915_request *request)
> {
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine = request->engine;
>
> - GEM_TRACE("%s fence %llx:%d <- global_seqno %d\n",
> - request->engine->name,
> + GEM_TRACE("%s fence %llx:%d <- global_seqno %d, current %d\n",
> + engine->name,
> request->fence.context, request->fence.seqno,
> - request->global_seqno);
> + request->global_seqno,
> + intel_engine_get_seqno(engine));
>
> GEM_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
> lockdep_assert_held(&engine->timeline->lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index ed2c833a8b20..b5235f52a81b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -454,10 +454,11 @@ static void execlists_submit_ports(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
> desc = execlists_update_context(rq);
> GEM_DEBUG_EXEC(port[n].context_id = upper_32_bits(desc));
>
> - GEM_TRACE("%s in[%d]: ctx=%d.%d, seqno=%x, prio=%d\n",
> + GEM_TRACE("%s in[%d]: ctx=%d.%d, seqno=%d (current %d), prio=%d\n",
> engine->name, n,
> port[n].context_id, count,
> rq->global_seqno,
> + intel_engine_get_seqno(engine),
> rq_prio(rq));
> } else {
> GEM_BUG_ON(!n);
> @@ -999,10 +1000,11 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data)
> EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_USER));
>
> rq = port_unpack(port, &count);
> - GEM_TRACE("%s out[0]: ctx=%d.%d, seqno=%x, prio=%d\n",
> + GEM_TRACE("%s out[0]: ctx=%d.%d, seqno=%d (current %d), prio=%d\n",
> engine->name,
> port->context_id, count,
> rq ? rq->global_seqno : 0,
> + intel_engine_get_seqno(engine),
> rq ? rq_prio(rq) : 0);
>
> /* Check the context/desc id for this event matches */
>
The only thing I am not sure if HWS seqno is interesting in the two
above. But if you think it is it doesn't harm much.
Also in these two I had fence context:seqno instead to correlate easily
with (un)submit&co. That way when I select fence:context in an editor it
nicely highlights the whole flow relating to this request. Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list