[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/gem_tiled_fence_blits: Remember to mark up fence blits

[Ville Syrjälä]

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 08:49:58PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Older platforms require fence registers to perform blits, and so
> userspace is expected to mark up the objects to request fences be
> assigned.
> 
> Fixes: ff2db94acb53 ("igt/gem_tiled_fence_blits: Remove libdrm_intel dependence")
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108591
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>  tests/i915/gem_tiled_fence_blits.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_tiled_fence_blits.c b/tests/i915/gem_tiled_fence_blits.c
> index 7560fa52..e40a7b43 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_tiled_fence_blits.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_tiled_fence_blits.c
> @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ static void run_test(int fd, int count)
>  
>  	memset(reloc, 0, sizeof(reloc));
>  	memset(obj, 0, sizeof(obj));
> +	obj[0].flags = EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE;
> +	obj[1].flags = EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE;

No harm in always asking for the fence I suppose.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

>  	obj[2].handle = create_batch(fd, reloc);
>  	obj[2].relocs_ptr = to_user_pointer(reloc);
>  	obj[2].relocation_count = ARRAY_SIZE(reloc);
> -- 
> 2.19.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel