[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] igt/gem_tiled_fence_blits: Remember to mark up fence blits

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2018-10-30 13:32:39)
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 08:49:58PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Older platforms require fence registers to perform blits, and so
> > userspace is expected to mark up the objects to request fences be
> > assigned.
> > 
> > Fixes: ff2db94acb53 ("igt/gem_tiled_fence_blits: Remove libdrm_intel dependence")
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108591
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > ---
> >  tests/i915/gem_tiled_fence_blits.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_tiled_fence_blits.c b/tests/i915/gem_tiled_fence_blits.c
> > index 7560fa52..e40a7b43 100644
> > --- a/tests/i915/gem_tiled_fence_blits.c
> > +++ b/tests/i915/gem_tiled_fence_blits.c
> > @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ static void run_test(int fd, int count)
> >  
> >       memset(reloc, 0, sizeof(reloc));
> >       memset(obj, 0, sizeof(obj));
> > +     obj[0].flags = EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE;
> > +     obj[1].flags = EXEC_OBJECT_NEEDS_FENCE;
> 
> No harm in always asking for the fence I suppose.

If the fence isn't required for the GPU (i.e. gen4+) we just quietly
pretend it was never requested. Probably violates the principle of least
surprise (I asked for a fence!!!), but oh well.
-Chris