[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Add AML id into KBL_ULX support list
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Fri Sep 21 21:14:39 UTC 2018
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 10:46:43AM -0700, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 09:17 -0700, Lee, Shawn C wrote:
> > According to patch "drm/i915/aml: Introducing Amber Lake platform"
> > (e364672477a1). Amber Lake uses the same gen graphics as Kaby Lake.
> > And it is the member of KBL ULX series.
> >
> > So far, IS_KBL_ULX macro did not include AML platform. It may caused
> > driver load DDI translation table for KBL H/S series for AML system.
> > The change will lead driver to apply translation table for KBL Y for
> > AML device to avoid unexpected eDP/DP signal quality issue.
> >
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> > Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee, Shawn C <shawn.c.lee at intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index 808204a7ca7c..0388de4d64a2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -2460,7 +2460,9 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv)
> > INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x5926)
> > #define IS_KBL_ULX(dev_priv) (INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x590E || \
> > INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x5915 || \
> > - INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x591E)
> > + INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x591E || \
> > + INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x591C || \
> > + INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv) == 0x87C0)
>
> I guess we should keep the AML/WHL pattern, so could you create
> IS_AML_ULX() add AML IDs and then include add IS_AML_ULX() to
> IS_KBL_ULX()?
I have a mixed feeling with patterns. I like them, but BDW times
showed they get sometimes hidden hence forgotten so it is hard
to maintain.
Anyway, defining as ITS_OWN_PLATFORM_ULX and them embedded them
here or using there directly on the code NEW_ULX || KBL_ULX
is desired.
Otherwise if we define here inside KBL ULX we might thing this is
KBL. :/
>
> > #define IS_SKL_GT2(dev_priv) (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && \
> > (dev_priv)->info.gt == 2)
> > #define IS_SKL_GT3(dev_priv) (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && \
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list