[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/32] drm/i915: Move GraphicsTechnology files under gt/
jani.nikula at intel.com
Tue Apr 23 09:40:10 UTC 2019
I'll want two things:
* Explicit ack from Rodrigo too
* The dependencies merged first, and this one posted as a single
patch. I really want this to stand out better, instead of semi-hidden
in the middle of a 30+ patch series.
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
On Tue, 23 Apr 2019, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2019-04-18 15:04:49)
>> + Jani and Rodrigo to comment
> No objection here and drm-intel-next was freshly tagged, so this is:
> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> Regards, Joonas
>> I'm definitely all for doing this, so it's only a matter of the timing.
>> Question is, do we want to do it right now after last drm-intel-next was
>> tagged, or do we want to wait a couple of release candidates.
>> I'm leaning towards doing this ASAP, as git cherry-pick should
>> understand that they're just renames, so there should be no issue with
>> doing the -fixes.
>> Regards, Joonas
>> Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-04-17 10:56:32)
>> > Start partitioning off the code that talks to the hardware (GT) from the
>> > uapi layers and move the device facing code under gt/
>> > One casualty is s/intel_ringbuffer.h/intel_engine.h/ with the plan to
>> > subdivide that header and body further (and split out the submission
>> > code from the ringbuffer and logical context handling). This patch aims
>> > to be simple motion so git can fixup inflight patches with little mess.
>> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx