[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for add more probe failures (rev6)

[Michal Wajdeczko]

On Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:30:19 +0200, Chris Wilson  
<chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:

> Quoting Patchwork (2019-08-02 14:12:38)
>> == Series Details ==
>>
>> Series: add more probe failures (rev6)
>> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/64390/
>> State : failure
>>
>> == Summary ==
>>
>> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_6614 -> Patchwork_13848
>> ====================================================
>>
>> Summary
>> -------
>>
>>   **FAILURE**
>>
>>   Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_13848 absolutely need  
>> to be
>>   verified manually.
>>
>>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>>   introduced in Patchwork_13848, please notify your bug team to allow  
>> them
>>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives  
>> in CI.
>>
>>   External URL:  
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13848/
>>
>> Possible new issues
>> -------------------
>>
>>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in  
>> Patchwork_13848:
>>
>> ### IGT changes ###
>>
>> #### Possible regressions ####
>>
>>   * igt at i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection:
>>     - fi-cfl-guc:         [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2]
>>    [1]:  
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6614/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection.html
>>    [2]:  
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13848/fi-cfl-guc/igt@i915_module_load@reload-with-fault-injection.html
>
> Looks like we didn't flush the cleanup we started before reporting the
> error. Maybe,

it's "leaked" guc err log, that we now try to free after gem, see:

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip/commit/?id=6f76098fe0f3f0b519b2ad528b4319195d6d0f73