[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Remove DDI IO power domain from PG3 power domains
Imre Deak
imre.deak at intel.com
Mon Aug 5 09:49:13 UTC 2019
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:03:24AM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> DDI IO power domain are in IO/PHY/AFE power domains. Which does not
> require PG3 power well to be enable.
Thanks for tracking this down.
Imo the commit message would be clearer by saying:
The DDI-IO power wells are backing the IO/PHY functionality which
doesn't need the PG3 power power well. Accordingly fix up the list of
PG3 power domains.
> MIPI DSI dual link gets "DDI B" IO power domain reference count which
> enables PG3 since "DDI B" IO power domain is part of PG3 power domain,
> that makes power leakage in MIPI DSI dual link use case.
>
> Cc: Deak Imre <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Cc: Syrjala Ville <ville.syrjala at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index dd2a50b8ba0a..ca33e8d41218 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -2482,11 +2482,8 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_C) | \
> BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_B_PANEL_FITTER) | \
> BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_B_LANES) | \
> - BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_B_IO) | \
> BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_C_LANES) | \
> - BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_C_IO) | \
> BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_D_LANES) | \
> - BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_D_IO) | \
> BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_E_LANES) | \
> BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_E_IO) | \
What about the E/F ports' IO power wells?
> BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_F_LANES) | \
> --
> 2.21.0
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list