[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/icl: Remove DDI IO power domain from PG3 power domains

Imre Deak imre.deak at intel.com
Mon Aug 5 09:49:13 UTC 2019


On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 09:03:24AM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:

> DDI IO power domain are in IO/PHY/AFE power domains.  Which does not
> require PG3 power well to be enable.

Thanks for tracking this down.

Imo the commit message would be clearer by saying:

The DDI-IO power wells are backing the IO/PHY functionality which
doesn't need the PG3 power power well. Accordingly fix up the list of
PG3 power domains.

> MIPI DSI dual link gets "DDI B" IO power domain reference count which
> enables PG3 since "DDI B" IO power domain is part of PG3 power domain,
> that makes power leakage in MIPI DSI dual link use case.

> 
> Cc: Deak Imre <imre.deak at intel.com>
> Cc: Syrjala Ville <ville.syrjala at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> index dd2a50b8ba0a..ca33e8d41218 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> @@ -2482,11 +2482,8 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_C) |		\
>  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_B_PANEL_FITTER) |	\
>  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_B_LANES) |	\
> -	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_B_IO) |		\
>  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_C_LANES) |	\
> -	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_C_IO) |		\
>  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_D_LANES) |	\
> -	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_D_IO) |		\
>  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_E_LANES) |	\
>  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_E_IO) |		\

What about the E/F ports' IO power wells?

>  	BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_F_LANES) |	\
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list