[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/39] drm/i915/bdw+: Enable PSR in any eDP port

Gupta, Anshuman anshuman.gupta at intel.com
Thu Aug 22 16:20:27 UTC 2019


Verified from B.Specs:7723 and B.Spec:8041

On 8/16/2019 1:34 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> From: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> 
>  From BDW+ the PSR registers moved from DDIA to transcoder, so any port
> with a eDP panel connected can have PSR, so lets remove this limitation.
> 
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 7 +++----
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 36bdc16fb43b..6eedd8281e72 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -578,11 +578,10 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * HSW spec explicitly says PSR is tied to port A.
> -	 * BDW+ platforms have a instance of PSR registers per transcoder but
> -	 * for now it only supports one instance of PSR, so lets keep it
> -	 * hardcoded to PORT_A
> +         * BDW+ platforms with DDI implementation of PSR have different
> +	 * PSR registers per transcoder.
>   	 */
> -	if (dig_port->base.port != PORT_A) {
> +	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) && dig_port->base.port != PORT_A) {
>   		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: Port not supported\n");
>   		return;
>   	}
> 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list