[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/39] drm/i915/bdw+: Enable PSR in any eDP port

[Gupta, Anshuman]

On 8/22/2019 9:50 PM, Gupta, Anshuman wrote:
> Verified from B.Specs:7723 and B.Spec:8041
> 
> On 8/16/2019 1:34 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> From: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
>>
>>  From BDW+ the PSR registers moved from DDIA to transcoder, so any port
>> with a eDP panel connected can have PSR, so lets remove this limitation.
>>
>> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan at intel.com>
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 7 +++----
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> index 36bdc16fb43b..6eedd8281e72 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
>> @@ -578,11 +578,10 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct intel_dp 
>> *intel_dp,
>>       /*
>>        * HSW spec explicitly says PSR is tied to port A.
>> -     * BDW+ platforms have a instance of PSR registers per transcoder 
>> but
>> -     * for now it only supports one instance of PSR, so lets keep it
>> -     * hardcoded to PORT_A
>> +         * BDW+ platforms with DDI implementation of PSR have different
>> +     * PSR registers per transcoder.
>>        */
>> -    if (dig_port->base.port != PORT_A) {
>> +    if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) && dig_port->base.port != PORT_A) {
>>           DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR condition failed: Port not supported\n");
>>           return;
>>       }
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx