[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/display: description-based initialization for remaining ddi platforms
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at linux.intel.com
Tue Dec 31 10:26:14 UTC 2019
On Tue, 31 Dec 2019, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com> wrote:
>> Support remaining platforms under HAS_DDI() by providing a slightly more
>> complex is_port_present() hook. The downside is that now we call
>> I915_READ(SFUSE_STRAP) for each port being initialized, but that's only
>> on initialization: a few more mmio reads won't hurt.
>>
>> Alternatives would be to provide one hook per port, or to have a
>> "pre_init()" hook that takes care of the mmio read. However I think this
>> is simpler - we may need to adapt if future platforms don't follow the
>> same initialization "template".
>
> All of this really makes me wonder if we end up being *more* complicated
> overall by trying very hard to make this generic, when, in reality, it
> doesn't seem to be all that generic.
>
> As I said, two relatively low hanging improvements would be a) moving
> VBT specific hacks to intel_bios.c and b) adding port mask to
> intel_device_info. Those two alone would go a long way in simplifying
> intel_setup_outputs().
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 72 +++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index 6b4d320ff92c..ad85cf75c815 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -16246,6 +16246,34 @@ static bool icl_is_port_present(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> intel_bios_is_port_present(i915, PORT_F);
>> }
>>
>> +static bool ddi_is_port_present(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> + const struct intel_ddi_port_info *port_info)
>> +{
>> + /* keep I915_READ() happy */
>
> Display could get rid of I915_READ and I915_WRITE after
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/70298/ ...
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = i915;
>> +
>> + if (port_info->port == PORT_A)
>> + return I915_READ(DDI_BUF_CTL(PORT_A))
>> + & DDI_INIT_DISPLAY_DETECTED;
>> +
>> + if (port_info->port == PORT_E)
>> + return IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv) &&
>> + intel_bios_is_port_present(i915, PORT_E);
>> +
>> + switch (port_info->port) {
>> + case PORT_B:
>> + return I915_READ(SFUSE_STRAP) & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIB_DETECTED;
>> + case PORT_C:
>> + return I915_READ(SFUSE_STRAP) & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIC_DETECTED;
>> + case PORT_D:
>> + return I915_READ(SFUSE_STRAP) & SFUSE_STRAP_DDID_DETECTED;
>> + case PORT_F:
>> + return I915_READ(SFUSE_STRAP) & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIF_DETECTED;
>> + default:
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> static const struct intel_output tgl_output = {
>> .dsi_init = icl_dsi_init,
>> .ddi_ports = {
>> @@ -16296,11 +16324,24 @@ static const struct intel_output gen9lp_output = {
>> },
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct intel_output ddi_output = {
>> + .is_port_present = ddi_is_port_present,
>> + .ddi_ports = {
>> + { .port = PORT_A },
>> + { .port = PORT_B },
>> + { .port = PORT_C },
>> + { .port = PORT_D },
>> + { .port = PORT_E },
>> + { .port = PORT_F },
>> + { .port = PORT_NONE }
>> + }
>> +};
>> +
>> /*
>> * Use a description-based approach for platforms that can be supported with a
>> * static table
>> */
>> -static void setup_ddi_outputs_desc(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> +static void setup_ddi_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> {
>> const struct intel_output *output;
>> const struct intel_ddi_port_info *port_info;
>> @@ -16313,6 +16354,8 @@ static void setup_ddi_outputs_desc(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> output = &icl_output;
>> else if (IS_GEN9_LP(i915))
>> output = &gen9lp_output;
>> + else
>> + output = &ddi_output;
>>
>> for (port_info = output->ddi_ports;
>> port_info->port != PORT_NONE; port_info++) {
>> @@ -16338,35 +16381,12 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> return;
>>
>> if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11 || IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) {
>> - setup_ddi_outputs_desc(dev_priv);
>> + setup_ddi_outputs(dev_priv);
>> } else if (HAS_DDI(dev_priv)) {
>> - int found;
>> -
>> if (intel_ddi_crt_present(dev_priv))
>> intel_crt_init(dev_priv);
PS. You still need stuff like this after the supposedly generic output
setup...
>>
>> - found = I915_READ(DDI_BUF_CTL(PORT_A)) & DDI_INIT_DISPLAY_DETECTED;
>> - if (found)
>> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
>> -
>> - /* DDI B, C, D, and F detection is indicated by the SFUSE_STRAP
>> - * register */
>> - found = I915_READ(SFUSE_STRAP);
>> -
>> - if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIB_DETECTED)
>> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
>> - if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIC_DETECTED)
>> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_C);
>> - if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDID_DETECTED)
>> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_D);
>> - if (found & SFUSE_STRAP_DDIF_DETECTED)
>> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_F);
>> - /*
>> - * On SKL we don't have a way to detect DDI-E so we rely on VBT.
>> - */
>> - if (IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv) &&
>> - intel_bios_is_port_present(dev_priv, PORT_E))
>> - intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_E);
>> + setup_ddi_outputs(dev_priv);
>> } else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv)) {
>> int found;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list