[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 2/4] gitlab-ci: add libatomic to docker images

Ser, Simon simon.ser at intel.com
Fri Jun 14 11:24:53 UTC 2019


On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 13:00 +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 02:53:20PM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
> > Add libatomic to the Fedora docker image so it can link binaries that
> > use __atomic_* functions.  Also explicitly add libatomic1 to Debian
> > docker images even though it's already installed as a dependency.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker at collabora.com>
> > ---
> >  Dockerfile.debian       | 1 +
> >  Dockerfile.debian-arm64 | 1 +
> >  Dockerfile.debian-armhf | 1 +
> >  Dockerfile.fedora       | 2 +-
> >  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Dockerfile.debian b/Dockerfile.debian
> > index b9c3be3945e0..d23591850c4e 100644
> > --- a/Dockerfile.debian
> > +++ b/Dockerfile.debian
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ RUN apt-get install -y \
> >  			flex \
> >  			bison \
> >  			pkg-config \
> > +			libatomic1 \
> >  			libpciaccess-dev \
> >  			libkmod-dev \
> >  			libprocps-dev \
> > diff --git a/Dockerfile.debian-arm64 b/Dockerfile.debian-arm64
> > index 7b3a3c7ca803..003bb22b3215 100644
> > --- a/Dockerfile.debian-arm64
> > +++ b/Dockerfile.debian-arm64
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ RUN apt-get install -y \
> >  			flex \
> >  			bison \
> >  			pkg-config \
> > +			libatomic1 \
> >  			x11proto-dri2-dev \
> >  			python-docutils \
> >  			valgrind \
> > diff --git a/Dockerfile.debian-armhf b/Dockerfile.debian-armhf
> > index c67a1e2acf6a..3139927c193a 100644
> > --- a/Dockerfile.debian-armhf
> > +++ b/Dockerfile.debian-armhf
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ RUN apt-get install -y \
> >  			flex \
> >  			bison \
> >  			pkg-config \
> > +			libatomic1 \
> 
> libatomic1 is the runtime lib, for linking you need the package that
> contains libatomic.so. That is *quick search*
> libgcc-$version-dev. There doesn't seem to be a generic metapackage
> for "the latest libgcc-dev", other than... 'gcc'.
> 
> Since Debian is acting a bit speshul here I'd just drop the explicit
> libatomic installation.

Hmm, I see the .so in libatomic1…

https://packages.debian.org/jessie/amd64/libatomic1/filelist

> 
> 
> >  			x11proto-dri2-dev \
> >  			python-docutils \
> >  			valgrind \
> > diff --git a/Dockerfile.fedora b/Dockerfile.fedora
> > index 6686e587613d..c84b412b0723 100644
> > --- a/Dockerfile.fedora
> > +++ b/Dockerfile.fedora
> > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> >  FROM fedora:30
> >  
> >  RUN dnf install -y \
> > -	gcc flex bison meson ninja-build xdotool \
> > +	gcc flex bison libatomic meson ninja-build xdotool \
> 
> Possibly the same comment on fedora but I'm not aware of how they
> split their gcc package. Anyway, the file to check for is
> 'libatomic.so'.
> 
> 


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list