[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 2/4] gitlab-ci: add libatomic to docker images

[Petri Latvala]

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:24:53PM +0300, Ser, Simon wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 13:00 +0300, Petri Latvala wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 02:53:20PM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
> > > Add libatomic to the Fedora docker image so it can link binaries that
> > > use __atomic_* functions.  Also explicitly add libatomic1 to Debian
> > > docker images even though it's already installed as a dependency.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker at collabora.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Dockerfile.debian       | 1 +
> > >  Dockerfile.debian-arm64 | 1 +
> > >  Dockerfile.debian-armhf | 1 +
> > >  Dockerfile.fedora       | 2 +-
> > >  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Dockerfile.debian b/Dockerfile.debian
> > > index b9c3be3945e0..d23591850c4e 100644
> > > --- a/Dockerfile.debian
> > > +++ b/Dockerfile.debian
> > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ RUN apt-get install -y \
> > >  			flex \
> > >  			bison \
> > >  			pkg-config \
> > > +			libatomic1 \
> > >  			libpciaccess-dev \
> > >  			libkmod-dev \
> > >  			libprocps-dev \
> > > diff --git a/Dockerfile.debian-arm64 b/Dockerfile.debian-arm64
> > > index 7b3a3c7ca803..003bb22b3215 100644
> > > --- a/Dockerfile.debian-arm64
> > > +++ b/Dockerfile.debian-arm64
> > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ RUN apt-get install -y \
> > >  			flex \
> > >  			bison \
> > >  			pkg-config \
> > > +			libatomic1 \
> > >  			x11proto-dri2-dev \
> > >  			python-docutils \
> > >  			valgrind \
> > > diff --git a/Dockerfile.debian-armhf b/Dockerfile.debian-armhf
> > > index c67a1e2acf6a..3139927c193a 100644
> > > --- a/Dockerfile.debian-armhf
> > > +++ b/Dockerfile.debian-armhf
> > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ RUN apt-get install -y \
> > >  			flex \
> > >  			bison \
> > >  			pkg-config \
> > > +			libatomic1 \
> > 
> > libatomic1 is the runtime lib, for linking you need the package that
> > contains libatomic.so. That is *quick search*
> > libgcc-$version-dev. There doesn't seem to be a generic metapackage
> > for "the latest libgcc-dev", other than... 'gcc'.
> > 
> > Since Debian is acting a bit speshul here I'd just drop the explicit
> > libatomic installation.
> 
> Hmm, I see the .so in libatomic1…
> 
> https://packages.debian.org/jessie/amd64/libatomic1/filelist


Where? I only see the .so.1 and .so.1.1.0


-- 
Petri Latvala